The virus and germ people will not go down without a fight. I agree with you; the fact that the existence of viruses is now being debated more openly is a great thing. Thanks for doing what you do.
Hi Bill, you are my one stop shop for chronicling this ongoing saga. Thank you! A few points, is there anything solid to say these folk are gatekeepers? I have seen whispers on the internet but nothing other than speculation based on their behavior. I dont necessarily disagree with this assertion, it would just be good to see something more solid. Its certainly clear even from an economic perspective that ICAN and Children's health defense mission statements of preventing childhood illness would die the same death as virology, were the paradigm to be overcome, all vaccines were ceased and the real cause of illness was finally investigated.
I haven't watched the video yet, but first off, Derek Broze is the man. I wonder if you are aware of Ryan Christian who's site www.thelastamericanvagabond.com he contributes to. Ryan had Kauffman on a couple of times a year ago and was quite vocal on the no virus theory but I haven't hear much from him lately. Interesting.
Lastly and maybe most important. Are you aware of World Alternative Media? They have channels on most video platforms. They guy behind it interviewed Del November last year ago ( https://www.bitchute.com/video/QsDZDBhJYkWa/ go to 6min30sec), he gave the same line of the world isnt ready and we can beat them at their own game. I cut him slack at the time as things were more dire so i could at least see his logic. Since then, the covid headlines have dried up, he has done shows on homeschooling, his family, monsanto, yet doesn't have time to devote even part of a show to this question. 'Now is not the time' may have got a pass a year ago. It is a straight up excuse now. What i also find interesting is the chat on their website. I have brought up this question several times recently. Despite the fact Kauffman only featured on the show because of 'popular demand', and none of his claims were ever refuted, if you mention this in the chat, you are swamped by people accusing you of being 'cointel pro'. Are these paid trolls? Where are all the fans that got Kauffman on thru sheer power of their voice 2 years ago? Its all very strange.
> is there anything solid to say these folk are gatekeepers?
Hi Nick, I'm not sure what you mean exactly. It sounds like you are reading the term gatekeepers to mean "controlled opposition", which implies that someone is controlling them.
I try not to engage in that kind of speculation. I'm using the term gatekeepers as a FUNCTIONAL term. It is a simple fact that Del Bigtree, RFK Jr, and Reiner Fuellmich ARE ACTING as gatekeepers, because anyone platformed by these folks, get huge reach. And anyone whom they choose to ignore get pushed into the margins.
> ICAN and Children's Health Defense ... would die the same death as virology, were the paradigm to be overcome,
That is a really brilliant observation and probably has a lot to do with what we see, along with the influence of their major donors, which are secret.
I have some knowledge of the nonprofit world, I will tell you you don't get an organization with a $3 million budget without major donors.
Ryan Cristian/TLAV really disgusts me because he platforms the virus pushers I'd say 50:1 or worse over #TeamNoVirus. There is only one truth, and if Ryan can't figure it out after 2.5 years, then he's either an idiot, or he's working for the enemy. I can't listen to him anymore because he's so widely inconsistent, but favoring the virus pushers.
I like Josh at WAM. He's done some great videos eg the Omicron video w/Kaufman. I don't follow him too closely, but I'll check the Bigtree interview. Thx.
> doesn't have time to devote even part of a show to this question.
Yeah another person I've seen like that is Brian at High Impact Flix. He gets it! I saw one super solid video that he made on this issue, he NAILED the isolation issue, and cited Christine Massey's work. ... then...(passage of time)... crickets. I can only assume some mechanism of influence got to him, but other than that I'm clueless.
>FUNCTIONAL term ... thanks for the clarification. this makes sense. Yes i tend to view in the sense i see James Corbett frequently use the term, more in a controlled opposition sense.
BTW, while Corbett makes his opinion clear at least, he believes its divisional like he personally saw in the 911 movement, I dont think he grasps the fundamental nature of the question here. And frankly, hes smart enough that 'doesnt understand' doesnt seem too credible. I cut him a lot of slack for the stuff hes put out over the years but gotta wonder at some point about him too.
>Yes Ryan has disappointed me of late and i have gone off him too. With a show catch phrase of 'question everything' i would expect more. He has responded to the odd incidental correction i have emailed him about. He's very good at that, but since i have followed up on this particular issue with him, I have not heard back. Inexplicable to think he hasnt given a word to the virus challenge or the goings on of the last week. Especially when he was clearly siding with Kauffman's thoughts 12 months plus ago. Hard to know what goes on with outside influences, especially for these smaller channels, and especially viewing from all the way over here in Dr Bailey's NZ. They are all just faces on a screen to a large extent.
> [James] Corbett makes his opinion clear at least, he believes its divisional like he personally saw in the 911 movement
I have never heard of James Corbett addressing the issue of "the virus" ... If you have a link or a reference to such, I would appreciate receiving it very much. WilliamAHuston@gmail.com or WilliamAHuston@protommail.com
> Inexplicable to think he hasnt given a word to the virus challenge or the goings on of the last week.
I don't think it's inexplicable. Actually it's exactly what I would expect. Because unfortunately Ryan has no idea where the front is. He's too busy platforming douchebag virus pushers like Peter Mccullough 🤷♂️🤦♂️🤢🤮 and that whole gang. Gross.
Again on Ryan, he was vocal on his position leaning to the no virus side some time ago. So would love to be a fly on the wall when whatever changed... changed (whatever changed hands perhaps??).
Re Corbett it was nothing more than a passing comment in a small clip he did, direct comparison to Nano thermite v 'direct energy weapons' type paradigm and how he views it having cannibalized the movement when so much else was agreed upon between different factions. He was commenting that he could see the same thing happening with health freedom movement. I do have time for this sentiment at least to some extent. Somewhat similar to Farber's musings in the last couple of days. Its never pretty and it does weaken the health freedom movement generally. I guess where i would differ from his 911 truth take is that whatever brought down the buildings is far less fundamental a question to what that was all about, than the existence of viruses is to what this is all about.
Corbett does have cover here though. He has not platformed doctors (aside from Rancourt once who has a nuanced view anyhow) and he does position himself in the geopolitical space quite clearly. Im just saying whether intentionally hiding from the question or not, he has an alibi.
Come to think of it... i emailed him to let him know of an interview on the whistleblower newsroom with an indian fella on the Gates scandals in india. He replied quick as a flash telling me he was just about to interview him as well. I thought wow he does respond promptly. I replied outlining my view on importance of the no virus question and simply what was his opinion.... crickets. Never replied. Where i do think he should be very interested is here.. he talks much about the terrorism paradigm. Ie everyone is a potential terrorist so we need to surveille you all. He also talks a lot about the bio terror paradigm, so much more dangerous. Not only could everyone be a bio terrorist, you might be one and not even know it. A dirty dangerous virus carrier. When you think about the 70 plus year rockefeller funded enterprise of virology, I really dont think its beyond the pale to imagine this was invented at least in part to be used for this very purpose. It dovetails perfectly with the already express intentions to track everyone and everything. Right down to the bio level.
Not to mention, im pretty sure James has done a documentary style video on Rockefeller taking over medicine. So its interesting, to your point, that he hasn't gone down this path further of questioning allopathic medicine and its role in creating essentially a bio-terrorism society.
(In fact. Speaking of bio-terrorism.... didn't Corbett also do a video on the biolabs in Ukraine? 🤔 seems to me there has been plenty of relevant opportunities in his research to go down this rabbit hole, yet he chooses not to. He can't possibly be oblivious to the conversation at this point in the game....)
He had a documentary on Rockefeller Medicine, that was the title. I think he doesn't want to touch certain topics because maybe he thinks it would be divisive and he is maybe right.
His stuff on technocracy and social engineering is very good. He also seems to touch on paradigm level thinking, which germ theory and terrain theory is a paradigm topic.
There's so much unknown in both spheres of thought that it's not "settled" Rockefeller medicine and fraud can be clearly proved and I think even if you believe in germ theory, it's still debunked. They debunk themselves and try to cover it up.
Corbett is going for wide audience, waking up sleeping minds. Most people aren't ready for a paradigm shift right off the bat. I give Corbett the benefit of the doubt because I know he is a good person who cares about humanity. He wants us to survive and thrive and is not the enemy.
Corbett is one of the best journalists I've encountered. He is focused on multiple issues, mostly technocracy and geopolitics and doesn't go into potentially divisive topics to "wake up" the masses.
Becoming paranoid about journalists such as Corbett will raise even more paranoia around "no-virus" because Corbett has fully established his credibility as a freedom fighter and he is one of the "good guys."
There is room for people questioning viruses, people who believe there are no viruses and people who believe in viruses to exist in a free society. Corbett's focus is on teaching people how to build a free society, which includes "allowing" people to think differently.
He's wrong about both Human Caused Global Warming, and also Peak Oil. He promotes a completely dodgy "Deep Oil Theory", which can be proven false a dozen different ways. (I've studied the Oil & Gas industry obsessively for ~the last decade, and the topic of Peak Oil for 20+years)
As a top journalist who's been on the leading edge of the COVID PSYOP from the beginning, his silence on "the virus" is deafening and quite odd.
Corbett thinks man made global warming via CO2 is a fraud. I am not up to date on climate science, but similar to the current scam, it's another fear tactic used to control.
Also, he doesn't have to agree with everything I believe. I'm sure we would disagree on topics. Disagreement is a normal. Diversity of thought is good. And he can be wrong on some issues too, but his work is still exceptional and worth while.
Wow, where to begin? Can you show how many times that Corbett has referenced anything related to Covid, lockdowns, vaccines (he has ALWAYS been against - since he first started his weekly videos), and then NOT mentioned that he opposes germ theory?
I haven't done enough research on climate change and CO2. I also haven't thoroughly researched dissenting scientists who have a different theory or hypothesis on climate change, so I don't have a good opinion yet. I am going to start though because I do think "climate lock-downs" are coming. The fear porn coming form global "elite" think tanks and MSM are very suspicious, similar to "the virus is gonna kill us all"
I think pollution, spraying stuff into the atmosphere and other weird things being done also contributes to killing off our planet. Bill Gates was talking about this too, "global dimming" or something like that.
I think there are areas that JC has not researched because he is researching other topics that he thinks are more important. He tries to look at paradigm stuff and general propaganda "problem reaction solution" then people can do their own research and come to their own conclusions.
What I have looked into about "the virus" is that this is not a cut and dry issue and the debate, the back and forth between people who claim viruses in general do exist and those that say they don't has not happened yet.
Some people say "viruses" are signaling structures, but they can be grown in the lab. Here's a paper that discusses a control experiment, which "no virus" supporters say never happen.
I will say that, I have not done enough research to say confidently "viruses don't exist" they are impossible. I need to do more research. I will say that Dr. Lanka et al do have a very logical theory that I have explored but not delved into enough. I do have a bachelors degree in the bio-sciences that is old, so this stuff is not in the forefront of my mind, but I know enough to do the research and understand what is being said. I'm reading Peter Duesbergs book Inventing AIDS, who had a different hypothesis "passenger viruses"
I think it is good to have diversity of thought. People can be wrong and we form a new theory together.
I haven't done enough research on whole genome sequencing, the actual math involved, how the machine works, and what the genenome database is constructed from.
What I will say though is that I don't care what experts say, no matter who they are, to make my own conclusions. I must look at the research on my own and I haven't done this.
You're correct that there are a lot of charlatans operating in the "Climate Change" space. People see that and incorrectly conclude, "Climate Change is a fake". The truth is a lot more nuanced that that. There IS something going on, they are just lying to us about what it really is and calling it "Climate Change". In fact, the truth is MUCH more horrible.
"COVID Lockdowns" and "Climate Lockdowns" are being done by the very same people for the very same function.
I have about 10 articles in the queue for my Substack, and that's one of them.
That paper, is junk. Just go to the Methods section. Read it. Here is what you always find: CONTAMINANTS: Fetal Bovine Serum, Monkey Kidney Cells (Vero), Human Lung Cancer cells A549, culture growth medium, culture transport medium, etc. Also in the mix is Metagenomics, Bioinformatics, In Silico Modeling, Meta-Transcriptonomics, Genomic Assembly.
Thank God for people like Kevin Corbett, Jon Rappoport, Andy Kaufman, Tom Cowan, #TeamBailey, EFC, Mike Stone, Christine Massey, Amandha Dawn Vollmer, Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos, Stefan Lanka, Tom Barnett, et al for cracking the code, and making it so simple to understand!
Here is an excerpt of the Methods section. Have a great day :)
Vero/hSLAM cell line (European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures [ECACC] #04091501)
Haha. Good on you. Theres a few around. Maybe cause immigrant heritage from the UK.
Im Auckland born and bred. Yes Dr Sam is Christchurch. A bit of a different culture down there much like states in the US i imagine. I will proudly claim the baileys as my own still!
I think that Ryan (TLAV) has alluded to the idea that he does not believe in germ theory. He is quick to claim that he is showing how the "germ theory - pro-vaccine pushers" even fail on their own terms. Also, Ryan is not an academic. But he reads a lot. He has really learned a lot over the last three years and is ready to shift his conclusions based on arguments and evidence.
Thank goodness that he is not bank rolled by any pro-vax people.
Yep iv been a fan of him over the years, and he has explicitly said after having Dr Kauffman on at least twice, that he was tending toward "his" view on virus existence, but that was at least 18 months ago. He covers ad nauseum latest developments in variants and virus science, meanwhile he did not (as far as i am aware) even cover the 'Settling the virus debate' document or the phenomenon of the health freedom movement turning against itself over this issue. It does seem he has been far less vocal on this.
I just asked on his substack what his position is 10 days ago, he has not replied.
As i said on his substack, he's perfectly entitled to his opinion, but if you agreed with Kauffman (team no virus generally) some time ago, then go silent on it, if you have changed your mind, you should say why / what changed / how have you debunked your former view.
Im a little disappointed he hasnt come back to the question!
On Reiner Fuellmich, I've been suspicious of him in general, simply because when he came on the scene, he touted his legal credentials (successfully sued big corporations, etc) and gave the impression that he was going to be taking legal action and that all the interviews were going to go toward building a case. Then, he seemed to switch and started saying "we have to try this in the court of public opinion." And then the woman who was working with him (Vivian Fischer?) came out and said he stole millions from their funds.
I think that Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, also in their group, was more of a no-virus type of guy, though I don't know for certain. I just know he was on some committee in the European Parliament and spoke out against the 2009 swine/bird flu, saying they were hoaxes.
I think Bigtree is trying to reach a wide audience. I think it's a tactic to stop the extreme assault on our liberty. And as winter approaches there will be more injections and masks and other bs.
I think both tactics, introducing new frameworks of understanding and simultaneously debunking vaccines and masks within the existing framework. Del is working on the latter. I don't think he is the enemy.
I didn't know he was "pushing" it, but I'll check this out. The sleeping masses do need to start waking up. I work with the public, most people are very entrenched in mainstream. But I don't listen to Bigtree much, his audience is more towards masses.
People pushed the Big Lie on 9/11 --an attack on the US by "Islamic terrorists," featuring the hijacking of 4 airliners, 2 of which brought down the (3) WTC rises, one of which hit the Pentagon and killed people, 1 which came down in Pennsylvania - in order to reach a wide audience to attempt to stop the war and an assault on liberty. This tactic was a MISERABLE FAILURE. And these people did their utmost to stop full inquiry into the Big Lie, people like Mike Ruppert and John Judge. LIVE AND LEARN, or else repeat the mistakes of the past.
Or maybe it's like the "planes versus no planes" I still don't know, there's good arguments for both, IMO. I don't know much about energy weapons but I do know that it was an inside job and they were responsible.
I was there, were you there? (the 9/11 truth movement, i don't mean 9/11 in New York or Washington). Hardly anyone ever claimed there were no planes, given how many people saw planes, though valid questions have been raised as to what kind of planes or flying objects were actually involved. In any event, the planes were a diversion prop. In terms of time frame, the pursuit of physical evidence was still a taboo subject for the leadership of the 9/11 truth movement two to three years after the event, exactly where we're now re the "Pandemic." And i am NOT a proponent of energy weapons being used at the WTC.
I meant the topic in general, but I get what you mean that you feel Del Bigtree isn't going "far enough"
I don't listen to him much so I don't really understand how he was pushing any particular view. I'll have to listen to what he was saying. I thought he was very mainstream to try to break the ice and even start a conversation with normies, to get a little bit of flexibility.
That implies that he's heading in the right direction, he just needs a little boost.
That is not my perception at all. He's heading in the opposite direction, the wrong direction.
I honestly don't know why so many people have trouble with this.
But I have to realize that my experiences and my knowledge are very different from those of other people.
I'm a a professional problem solver. I've been a technologist for 40+ years.
I have been very highly compensated to do maintenance on large complicated machines. (Large distributed computing networks, storage arrays, HPC Linux Clusters, and custom supercomputers with 1000s of individual nodes.)
In my job I had to be very efficient at solving problems. I generally have worked in shops with a small number of technicians maintaining a vast number of machines.
If I can't solve problems, or I don't get to the root cause and the problem keeps reoccurring, I can be in serious trouble with my boss at review time, and I might even get fired for incompetence.
This all has to do with ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS.
What is the root cause for all of COVID? What is the root cause for all of the unpleasant "countermeasures" that we've been exposed to for the past 2.5 years: Vaccines, Mandates, Vaccine Passports, Masks, Antisocial Distancing, Lockdowns, etc etc.
The ROOT CAUSE is ***the MF Virus***, which Del Bigtree, RFK Jr, & Reiner Fuellmich ALL PROMTE AS REAL while they CLAIM to be fighting the "Countermeasures".
That's not what I would call "not going far enough". They're in an airplane heading for Nome Alaska, when the destination was Miami.
They are not trying to solve the problem. They're playing a game.
I don't know what the game is exactly. I'm not going to speculate on their motivations...
But there's really no excuse. Reiner Fuellmich, and Bobby Kennedy are both two of the top attorneys in the world. These men are not stupid. Dell Bigtree is not stupid.
They all have massive budgets and I can only assume that they have major donors that are telling them to do this.
So one question is, who are their major donors? We should put pressure on them to get them to reveal this.
Because Children's Health Defense and ICAN had $3 million dollar budgets prior to COVID! You don't get $3 million dollar budgets on $20 donations. They both have some Fatcat Sugar Daddys paying their bills. Think about that.
I used to listen to an AMAZING blogger/commentator named Debbie/Sane Progressive. She was all over this before she vanished in 2018.
As an example, she talked about how Bernie Sanders was the Sheepdog for the Democratic party.
As people got fed up with the lies and the betrayal of the democratic party for the last 40 years, they would often look for an exit strategy, someplace else to go.
So long comes Bernie Sanders who seems like he's some kind of progressive and independent thinker that somehow exists within the party, sort of.
So vast numbers of people get seduced by his message into staying within the party... (Drumroll) ... Only to be ultimately betrayed by a con man to stay within the same criminal party for another four years.
Del Bigtree, Robert F Kennedy Jr, and Reiner Fuellmich are performing the EXACT SAME FUNCTION for Allopathic Medicine.
YES they have done a lot of good work exposing the harms of Vaccines.
HOWEVER, if we look a little deeper, we find something a bit more sinister.
As people get wise to the Criminal Fraud of Allopathic Medicine, along come the highly compensated SHEEPDOGS to seduce you into their FAKE oppositional narrative applied like a thin veneer, AS THEY PUSH the official Germ Theory narrative.
I'm going to write a blog about this, bc it keeps coming up.
To be more specific, plane flying from Denver to Nome when it's supposed to be headed to Miami. Plausible that you would fly to Nome before getting to Miami, if you're flying from Tokyo and are doing a great circle route. :-)
Indeed, Bigtree and his ilk are pushing "alternative treatments" for a virus not proven to exist and "bioweapon" narrative.
People are different than machines. There's a lot of brainwashing and cognitive dissonance. Sometimes seguing into information is a better approach. I work with the general public, talk to lots and lots of average people and just getting them to think a little bit different about something might get through the cognitive dissonance to get them curious and they can learn on their own.
People have to want to know and learn on their own. I don't listen to Del that often. It's sort of like the climate change thing too. That's gonna be another issue that comes up, "climate lockdown" I haven't even begun to look at the science in that arena.
FYI, im in Ryan (TLAV)'s discord group and followed him closely for awhile (and Derrick) - trying to bring more awareness to the NoVirus issue. The responses ive received have completely turned me off and I no longer engage with these so-called "investigative journalists"/"truth-seekers". I had a screenshot but I may have deleted it.
The reply was along the lines of what Del's excuse was. Basically that its too fantastical for the normies to believe, and therefore, is ignored because VIEWS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN TRUTH! Some of Ryan's direct responses to me & another guy who were ADAMANTLY & CONSISTENTLY trying to engage dialog really disgusted me. I wish I had saved them so I could quote word for word....
Ryan & Derrick are grifters. They pick & choose which topics they want to support. Ryan has also had Malone and several other "virus pushers against clot-shots" as Bill calls them (love the phrase by the way 😉) and puts these people up on a pedestal for some reason - also completely ignoring the OBVIOUS & GLARING red flags, if he were to ACTUALLY do his "due diligence" like he encourages his viewers to do.
Its not difficult to find this information about Malone, McCullough, etc, which is quite alarming considering they are self-proclaimed "leaders" or whatever of the "truth/health freedom" movement.
I have explained the importance of kicking down the virology house of cards to Ryan & group many times- rather than waste time trying to go over "tHe sCiEnCe™️" of masks, quackzines, lockdowns, treatment, ventilators, etc individually...... why wouldn't you kill all birds with 1 stone, if you had the means to do so? Its an easy & fast shortcut to truth and ultimately freedom. Instead, they dance around it, and would rather waste time picking apart each "measure/public health response", while also speaking positively of so-called treatments such as Ivermectin (which is essentially a poison), Hydroxycloroquine, etc. Its exhausting... I have spent literally 2 years trying to be patient & provide sources & data, encouraging Ryan to seriously look into terrain vs germ theory - at least spend the same amount of time researching that as he has any of the other topics. But he refuses. Because "it'll turn normies off", or whatever 🙄
I cant bother trying to engage with people like that anymore. Its a waste of my time.
Fascinating. How do you join that? Do you think it would do any good having another ally arguing the point with you? And do you get shouted down by trolls claiming you are cointel pro like on Bigtree's website, or is it at least civil discourse?
I donate a couple bucks a month through buy me a coffee and just haven't bothered cancelling in the couple months since i stopped watching. Might have to cancel and start sending that Bill's way instead :-)
As i said above, he had been vocally supportive of the no virus theory up until around 12 months ago so would love to know what changed. About the time Hudak started interviewing all the big names for him. I wonder if just more popular for his audience / business model.
I originally joined it from a direct link on his website. However, I heard it was removed because trolls were inviting themselves in or something. Now, I believe you need to be invited by a mod. If you catch one of his lives on YouTube pirate streams, you can ask a mod there. To be honest, I havent engaged with the group in..... 9 months? I was VERY active and then kinda disappeared overnight because I got so frustrated.
They dont pile on like a mob though. There are definitely some in the group that are genuinely open-minded & intrigued. Even one of his mods told me if I wanted to, I could send my research & she would make me a "channel" within the group to put it all. I thought about doing that, but then after some of the comments, I grew frustrated. Theres a few free-thinkers, but there are a lot of people that seem to let Ryan do their thinking for them. Since he hasnt taken it seriously, THEY dont take it seriously.
But by all means, if you can jump through the obstacles to get into the group and want to give it a try, maybe the tone has changed since I last visited.... my username on there is "Galactic Sirena" I think 🤔 (its been a while lol)
I will say that I met a handful of amazing people there. I just... idk... part of me feels like we are past the "information stage"... it is becoming a matter of life & death for many. If they have been exposed to this info, as a so-called truth/freedom-seeker, and glossed past it for whatever excuse they give, I tend to lose my patience with people after attempting for nearly 2 years. I guess for me, it was time to move on. Or take a break. I havent decided lol
Heh i know the feeling re your closing comments. Iv been watching Corbett for over a decade and TLAV for at least the first year of COVID. I mean lets be honest. Whatever reason the existence question isnt being handled, he did a huge amount of work covering everything else that first year in particular. But now, I'm pretty myopically focused on the existence question.
Think i might have seen you on live chat once or twice in the past. Plenty of irony in what you say about letting him do their thinking. The catch phrase is question everything, come to your own conclusions. But of course like any leader, if Jim Jones told his followers that, they would parrot it and wait for the next instruction!
I write to The Highwire and staff EVERY week. I am so disappointed in the continuous claim FOR the belief in pathogenic, exogenous, viruses. I try to be nice, but ... It is also annoying to see him parade people for whom we are supposed to feel sorry or empathy for being injured by the jabs.
Invariably, the "victims" are nurses, MDs. People who spent years poisoning babies and mothers and children.
I am also tried of Del giving us the idea that "the other vaccines are okay" - which is what RFK, Jr., always says. If someone like Michael Yeadon can see - in 2-3 hours, that his career in vaccinology and virology was horse crap, then all of us are ready for the truth.
Right on! One thing I notice from my Mercola, CHD, and ICAN emails/sites is that in their comments sections, there is no one discussing anything about terrain theory or that fact that viruses have never been shown to exist outside of in silico computations. This seems highly unlikely to be natural and is due to censorship of this narrative. I mean look at all of us here on substack, telegram, odysee, and everywhere else. And so I suspect that Mercola and RFKjr are the top 2 in that NYT list for a reason?? And I dislike how Guillermou always rises to the top of the comments of any Mercola article with his well researched comments right after publication of an article. They are well-informed, but I'm just saying, it doesn't seem organic.
it is a conspiracy. few billions claiming to have some sort of sickness which does not exist. it is in their mind and from there it goes to their body.
>few billions claiming to have some sort of sickness
Yeah, so? People get sick all the time. Homo Sapiens have gotten sick for the entire 300,000 years that we've walked the earth.
> some sort of sickness which does not exist.
There you go again, pandelis, putting words in my mouth.
I NEVER SAID "no one got sick".
What I've maintained consistently is that (PAY CAREFUL ATTENTION!)
👉 "COVID Syndrome" has no new, unique or distinguishing clinical expression (Pneumonia is NOT a new syndrome)
👉 There was NEVER any rigorous etiology preformed to find the cause of the non-new, non-unique, non-distinguishing syndrome (including a search for a TOXIC cause, eg, Air Pollution or 5G)
👉 SARS-CoV-2 is fictitious, a computer model,
👉 There is NO TEST for the fictitious virus which has ever been calibrated to anything in the Real World
👉 The fictitious virus has never been proven to cause clinical disease
Supplements are about as fictitious as COVID. I mean sure, they exist. But they dont do what they're said to do. And the methods used to "isolate" vitamins are equivalent to the methods used to "isolate" so-called viruses.
Heres a podcast to get you started. You should throw away all of your supplements. Seriously.
The word "spike" makes the avg person feel like something sharp will attack them. "Spikes" seen on EM are what's left of the vesicle surface after they are treated with trypsin that eats into the surface layer, like walking in the snow, you make holes but now the snow sticks out.
Of course there can be a protein made in a lab LABELED as "spike", and zillions of papers can be written about these sets of proteins, but we know that the propaganda makers are very good at crafting all kinds of stories to deceive you. Unless shown otherwise, I dont think there is any specific spike protein found in shot vials, nor mRNA, nor is there a dose-response curve of mRNA to spike protein study, nor any of these things found in people who received shots. It seems that all this is a cover for graphene and LNPs that hold graphene in the shots. The Japan biodisribution study looked at LNPs not spikes-because there is no spike. I will admit I fell for the mRNA-Spike story for at least a year even though I knew there was no virus, so there is no shame in learning and updating our ideas as new info comes in. There is a very clever and crafty info game going on to hide the Trojan horse.
The Del Bigtree Crime Syndicate will be exposed slowly, over time.
https://gregwyatt.net/del-bigtree-exposed/
The virus and germ people will not go down without a fight. I agree with you; the fact that the existence of viruses is now being debated more openly is a great thing. Thanks for doing what you do.
Hi Bill, you are my one stop shop for chronicling this ongoing saga. Thank you! A few points, is there anything solid to say these folk are gatekeepers? I have seen whispers on the internet but nothing other than speculation based on their behavior. I dont necessarily disagree with this assertion, it would just be good to see something more solid. Its certainly clear even from an economic perspective that ICAN and Children's health defense mission statements of preventing childhood illness would die the same death as virology, were the paradigm to be overcome, all vaccines were ceased and the real cause of illness was finally investigated.
I haven't watched the video yet, but first off, Derek Broze is the man. I wonder if you are aware of Ryan Christian who's site www.thelastamericanvagabond.com he contributes to. Ryan had Kauffman on a couple of times a year ago and was quite vocal on the no virus theory but I haven't hear much from him lately. Interesting.
Lastly and maybe most important. Are you aware of World Alternative Media? They have channels on most video platforms. They guy behind it interviewed Del November last year ago ( https://www.bitchute.com/video/QsDZDBhJYkWa/ go to 6min30sec), he gave the same line of the world isnt ready and we can beat them at their own game. I cut him slack at the time as things were more dire so i could at least see his logic. Since then, the covid headlines have dried up, he has done shows on homeschooling, his family, monsanto, yet doesn't have time to devote even part of a show to this question. 'Now is not the time' may have got a pass a year ago. It is a straight up excuse now. What i also find interesting is the chat on their website. I have brought up this question several times recently. Despite the fact Kauffman only featured on the show because of 'popular demand', and none of his claims were ever refuted, if you mention this in the chat, you are swamped by people accusing you of being 'cointel pro'. Are these paid trolls? Where are all the fans that got Kauffman on thru sheer power of their voice 2 years ago? Its all very strange.
> is there anything solid to say these folk are gatekeepers?
Hi Nick, I'm not sure what you mean exactly. It sounds like you are reading the term gatekeepers to mean "controlled opposition", which implies that someone is controlling them.
I try not to engage in that kind of speculation. I'm using the term gatekeepers as a FUNCTIONAL term. It is a simple fact that Del Bigtree, RFK Jr, and Reiner Fuellmich ARE ACTING as gatekeepers, because anyone platformed by these folks, get huge reach. And anyone whom they choose to ignore get pushed into the margins.
> ICAN and Children's Health Defense ... would die the same death as virology, were the paradigm to be overcome,
That is a really brilliant observation and probably has a lot to do with what we see, along with the influence of their major donors, which are secret.
I have some knowledge of the nonprofit world, I will tell you you don't get an organization with a $3 million budget without major donors.
Ryan Cristian/TLAV really disgusts me because he platforms the virus pushers I'd say 50:1 or worse over #TeamNoVirus. There is only one truth, and if Ryan can't figure it out after 2.5 years, then he's either an idiot, or he's working for the enemy. I can't listen to him anymore because he's so widely inconsistent, but favoring the virus pushers.
I like Josh at WAM. He's done some great videos eg the Omicron video w/Kaufman. I don't follow him too closely, but I'll check the Bigtree interview. Thx.
> doesn't have time to devote even part of a show to this question.
Yeah another person I've seen like that is Brian at High Impact Flix. He gets it! I saw one super solid video that he made on this issue, he NAILED the isolation issue, and cited Christine Massey's work. ... then...(passage of time)... crickets. I can only assume some mechanism of influence got to him, but other than that I'm clueless.
Agree, it's strange.❤️🙇🙏
>FUNCTIONAL term ... thanks for the clarification. this makes sense. Yes i tend to view in the sense i see James Corbett frequently use the term, more in a controlled opposition sense.
BTW, while Corbett makes his opinion clear at least, he believes its divisional like he personally saw in the 911 movement, I dont think he grasps the fundamental nature of the question here. And frankly, hes smart enough that 'doesnt understand' doesnt seem too credible. I cut him a lot of slack for the stuff hes put out over the years but gotta wonder at some point about him too.
>Yes Ryan has disappointed me of late and i have gone off him too. With a show catch phrase of 'question everything' i would expect more. He has responded to the odd incidental correction i have emailed him about. He's very good at that, but since i have followed up on this particular issue with him, I have not heard back. Inexplicable to think he hasnt given a word to the virus challenge or the goings on of the last week. Especially when he was clearly siding with Kauffman's thoughts 12 months plus ago. Hard to know what goes on with outside influences, especially for these smaller channels, and especially viewing from all the way over here in Dr Bailey's NZ. They are all just faces on a screen to a large extent.
> [James] Corbett makes his opinion clear at least, he believes its divisional like he personally saw in the 911 movement
I have never heard of James Corbett addressing the issue of "the virus" ... If you have a link or a reference to such, I would appreciate receiving it very much. WilliamAHuston@gmail.com or WilliamAHuston@protommail.com
> Inexplicable to think he hasnt given a word to the virus challenge or the goings on of the last week.
I don't think it's inexplicable. Actually it's exactly what I would expect. Because unfortunately Ryan has no idea where the front is. He's too busy platforming douchebag virus pushers like Peter Mccullough 🤷♂️🤦♂️🤢🤮 and that whole gang. Gross.
Again on Ryan, he was vocal on his position leaning to the no virus side some time ago. So would love to be a fly on the wall when whatever changed... changed (whatever changed hands perhaps??).
Re Corbett it was nothing more than a passing comment in a small clip he did, direct comparison to Nano thermite v 'direct energy weapons' type paradigm and how he views it having cannibalized the movement when so much else was agreed upon between different factions. He was commenting that he could see the same thing happening with health freedom movement. I do have time for this sentiment at least to some extent. Somewhat similar to Farber's musings in the last couple of days. Its never pretty and it does weaken the health freedom movement generally. I guess where i would differ from his 911 truth take is that whatever brought down the buildings is far less fundamental a question to what that was all about, than the existence of viruses is to what this is all about.
Corbett does have cover here though. He has not platformed doctors (aside from Rancourt once who has a nuanced view anyhow) and he does position himself in the geopolitical space quite clearly. Im just saying whether intentionally hiding from the question or not, he has an alibi.
Come to think of it... i emailed him to let him know of an interview on the whistleblower newsroom with an indian fella on the Gates scandals in india. He replied quick as a flash telling me he was just about to interview him as well. I thought wow he does respond promptly. I replied outlining my view on importance of the no virus question and simply what was his opinion.... crickets. Never replied. Where i do think he should be very interested is here.. he talks much about the terrorism paradigm. Ie everyone is a potential terrorist so we need to surveille you all. He also talks a lot about the bio terror paradigm, so much more dangerous. Not only could everyone be a bio terrorist, you might be one and not even know it. A dirty dangerous virus carrier. When you think about the 70 plus year rockefeller funded enterprise of virology, I really dont think its beyond the pale to imagine this was invented at least in part to be used for this very purpose. It dovetails perfectly with the already express intentions to track everyone and everything. Right down to the bio level.
Not to mention, im pretty sure James has done a documentary style video on Rockefeller taking over medicine. So its interesting, to your point, that he hasn't gone down this path further of questioning allopathic medicine and its role in creating essentially a bio-terrorism society.
(In fact. Speaking of bio-terrorism.... didn't Corbett also do a video on the biolabs in Ukraine? 🤔 seems to me there has been plenty of relevant opportunities in his research to go down this rabbit hole, yet he chooses not to. He can't possibly be oblivious to the conversation at this point in the game....)
He had a documentary on Rockefeller Medicine, that was the title. I think he doesn't want to touch certain topics because maybe he thinks it would be divisive and he is maybe right.
His stuff on technocracy and social engineering is very good. He also seems to touch on paradigm level thinking, which germ theory and terrain theory is a paradigm topic.
There's so much unknown in both spheres of thought that it's not "settled" Rockefeller medicine and fraud can be clearly proved and I think even if you believe in germ theory, it's still debunked. They debunk themselves and try to cover it up.
Corbett is going for wide audience, waking up sleeping minds. Most people aren't ready for a paradigm shift right off the bat. I give Corbett the benefit of the doubt because I know he is a good person who cares about humanity. He wants us to survive and thrive and is not the enemy.
Hey Bill, just sent you an email FYI. Not what you are asking for here but thought it might be of interest.
Cheers
Corbett is one of the best journalists I've encountered. He is focused on multiple issues, mostly technocracy and geopolitics and doesn't go into potentially divisive topics to "wake up" the masses.
Becoming paranoid about journalists such as Corbett will raise even more paranoia around "no-virus" because Corbett has fully established his credibility as a freedom fighter and he is one of the "good guys."
There is room for people questioning viruses, people who believe there are no viruses and people who believe in viruses to exist in a free society. Corbett's focus is on teaching people how to build a free society, which includes "allowing" people to think differently.
James Corbett is great, i agree.
But he's not right on every issue.
He's wrong about both Human Caused Global Warming, and also Peak Oil. He promotes a completely dodgy "Deep Oil Theory", which can be proven false a dozen different ways. (I've studied the Oil & Gas industry obsessively for ~the last decade, and the topic of Peak Oil for 20+years)
As a top journalist who's been on the leading edge of the COVID PSYOP from the beginning, his silence on "the virus" is deafening and quite odd.
Corbett thinks man made global warming via CO2 is a fraud. I am not up to date on climate science, but similar to the current scam, it's another fear tactic used to control.
Also, he doesn't have to agree with everything I believe. I'm sure we would disagree on topics. Disagreement is a normal. Diversity of thought is good. And he can be wrong on some issues too, but his work is still exceptional and worth while.
Wow, where to begin? Can you show how many times that Corbett has referenced anything related to Covid, lockdowns, vaccines (he has ALWAYS been against - since he first started his weekly videos), and then NOT mentioned that he opposes germ theory?
Thanks
I haven't done enough research on climate change and CO2. I also haven't thoroughly researched dissenting scientists who have a different theory or hypothesis on climate change, so I don't have a good opinion yet. I am going to start though because I do think "climate lock-downs" are coming. The fear porn coming form global "elite" think tanks and MSM are very suspicious, similar to "the virus is gonna kill us all"
I think pollution, spraying stuff into the atmosphere and other weird things being done also contributes to killing off our planet. Bill Gates was talking about this too, "global dimming" or something like that.
I think there are areas that JC has not researched because he is researching other topics that he thinks are more important. He tries to look at paradigm stuff and general propaganda "problem reaction solution" then people can do their own research and come to their own conclusions.
What I have looked into about "the virus" is that this is not a cut and dry issue and the debate, the back and forth between people who claim viruses in general do exist and those that say they don't has not happened yet.
Some people say "viruses" are signaling structures, but they can be grown in the lab. Here's a paper that discusses a control experiment, which "no virus" supporters say never happen.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7228321/#mja250569-fea-0003
I will say that, I have not done enough research to say confidently "viruses don't exist" they are impossible. I need to do more research. I will say that Dr. Lanka et al do have a very logical theory that I have explored but not delved into enough. I do have a bachelors degree in the bio-sciences that is old, so this stuff is not in the forefront of my mind, but I know enough to do the research and understand what is being said. I'm reading Peter Duesbergs book Inventing AIDS, who had a different hypothesis "passenger viruses"
I think it is good to have diversity of thought. People can be wrong and we form a new theory together.
I haven't done enough research on whole genome sequencing, the actual math involved, how the machine works, and what the genenome database is constructed from.
What I will say though is that I don't care what experts say, no matter who they are, to make my own conclusions. I must look at the research on my own and I haven't done this.
You're correct that there are a lot of charlatans operating in the "Climate Change" space. People see that and incorrectly conclude, "Climate Change is a fake". The truth is a lot more nuanced that that. There IS something going on, they are just lying to us about what it really is and calling it "Climate Change". In fact, the truth is MUCH more horrible.
"COVID Lockdowns" and "Climate Lockdowns" are being done by the very same people for the very same function.
I have about 10 articles in the queue for my Substack, and that's one of them.
That paper, is junk. Just go to the Methods section. Read it. Here is what you always find: CONTAMINANTS: Fetal Bovine Serum, Monkey Kidney Cells (Vero), Human Lung Cancer cells A549, culture growth medium, culture transport medium, etc. Also in the mix is Metagenomics, Bioinformatics, In Silico Modeling, Meta-Transcriptonomics, Genomic Assembly.
None of these methods have ever been validated.
SAY WHAT!
That is the purpose of the "Settling the Virus Debate" statement, aka, the "Virus Challenge". https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/
All of Virology is a complete SCAM.
Thank God for people like Kevin Corbett, Jon Rappoport, Andy Kaufman, Tom Cowan, #TeamBailey, EFC, Mike Stone, Christine Massey, Amandha Dawn Vollmer, Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos, Stefan Lanka, Tom Barnett, et al for cracking the code, and making it so simple to understand!
Here is an excerpt of the Methods section. Have a great day :)
Vero/hSLAM cell line (European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures [ECACC] #04091501)
Fun fact... My first lady friend was a ginger Kiwi. (She was twice my age!)
That's a recessive gene! There can't be too many of those.
I wonder if they're related?
Not likely i guess.
My friend was from the Auckland area. I think Dr Sam is from the South, Christchurch maybe?
Haha. Good on you. Theres a few around. Maybe cause immigrant heritage from the UK.
Im Auckland born and bred. Yes Dr Sam is Christchurch. A bit of a different culture down there much like states in the US i imagine. I will proudly claim the baileys as my own still!
I think that Ryan (TLAV) has alluded to the idea that he does not believe in germ theory. He is quick to claim that he is showing how the "germ theory - pro-vaccine pushers" even fail on their own terms. Also, Ryan is not an academic. But he reads a lot. He has really learned a lot over the last three years and is ready to shift his conclusions based on arguments and evidence.
Thank goodness that he is not bank rolled by any pro-vax people.
And he ALWAYS says, "make up your own mind."
Cheers.
Yep iv been a fan of him over the years, and he has explicitly said after having Dr Kauffman on at least twice, that he was tending toward "his" view on virus existence, but that was at least 18 months ago. He covers ad nauseum latest developments in variants and virus science, meanwhile he did not (as far as i am aware) even cover the 'Settling the virus debate' document or the phenomenon of the health freedom movement turning against itself over this issue. It does seem he has been far less vocal on this.
I just asked on his substack what his position is 10 days ago, he has not replied.
As i said on his substack, he's perfectly entitled to his opinion, but if you agreed with Kauffman (team no virus generally) some time ago, then go silent on it, if you have changed your mind, you should say why / what changed / how have you debunked your former view.
Im a little disappointed he hasnt come back to the question!
On Reiner Fuellmich, I've been suspicious of him in general, simply because when he came on the scene, he touted his legal credentials (successfully sued big corporations, etc) and gave the impression that he was going to be taking legal action and that all the interviews were going to go toward building a case. Then, he seemed to switch and started saying "we have to try this in the court of public opinion." And then the woman who was working with him (Vivian Fischer?) came out and said he stole millions from their funds.
I think that Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, also in their group, was more of a no-virus type of guy, though I don't know for certain. I just know he was on some committee in the European Parliament and spoke out against the 2009 swine/bird flu, saying they were hoaxes.
I think Bigtree is trying to reach a wide audience. I think it's a tactic to stop the extreme assault on our liberty. And as winter approaches there will be more injections and masks and other bs.
I think both tactics, introducing new frameworks of understanding and simultaneously debunking vaccines and masks within the existing framework. Del is working on the latter. I don't think he is the enemy.
I understand your position, but I respectfully, strongly, disagree.
Pushing The Big Lie as a tactic to "reach a larger audience" is really dumb, and counterproductive, IMHO.
Thanks for your response.
I didn't know he was "pushing" it, but I'll check this out. The sleeping masses do need to start waking up. I work with the public, most people are very entrenched in mainstream. But I don't listen to Bigtree much, his audience is more towards masses.
People pushed the Big Lie on 9/11 --an attack on the US by "Islamic terrorists," featuring the hijacking of 4 airliners, 2 of which brought down the (3) WTC rises, one of which hit the Pentagon and killed people, 1 which came down in Pennsylvania - in order to reach a wide audience to attempt to stop the war and an assault on liberty. This tactic was a MISERABLE FAILURE. And these people did their utmost to stop full inquiry into the Big Lie, people like Mike Ruppert and John Judge. LIVE AND LEARN, or else repeat the mistakes of the past.
Or maybe it's like the "planes versus no planes" I still don't know, there's good arguments for both, IMO. I don't know much about energy weapons but I do know that it was an inside job and they were responsible.
I was there, were you there? (the 9/11 truth movement, i don't mean 9/11 in New York or Washington). Hardly anyone ever claimed there were no planes, given how many people saw planes, though valid questions have been raised as to what kind of planes or flying objects were actually involved. In any event, the planes were a diversion prop. In terms of time frame, the pursuit of physical evidence was still a taboo subject for the leadership of the 9/11 truth movement two to three years after the event, exactly where we're now re the "Pandemic." And i am NOT a proponent of energy weapons being used at the WTC.
Dear Jeffrey Strahl,
There was recently a program on Guns and Butter wherein the guest spoke about the "no plane" theory. You might enjoy listening.
Best
I meant the topic in general, but I get what you mean that you feel Del Bigtree isn't going "far enough"
I don't listen to him much so I don't really understand how he was pushing any particular view. I'll have to listen to what he was saying. I thought he was very mainstream to try to break the ice and even start a conversation with normies, to get a little bit of flexibility.
> Bigtree isn't going "far enough"
That implies that he's heading in the right direction, he just needs a little boost.
That is not my perception at all. He's heading in the opposite direction, the wrong direction.
I honestly don't know why so many people have trouble with this.
But I have to realize that my experiences and my knowledge are very different from those of other people.
I'm a a professional problem solver. I've been a technologist for 40+ years.
I have been very highly compensated to do maintenance on large complicated machines. (Large distributed computing networks, storage arrays, HPC Linux Clusters, and custom supercomputers with 1000s of individual nodes.)
In my job I had to be very efficient at solving problems. I generally have worked in shops with a small number of technicians maintaining a vast number of machines.
If I can't solve problems, or I don't get to the root cause and the problem keeps reoccurring, I can be in serious trouble with my boss at review time, and I might even get fired for incompetence.
This all has to do with ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS.
What is the root cause for all of COVID? What is the root cause for all of the unpleasant "countermeasures" that we've been exposed to for the past 2.5 years: Vaccines, Mandates, Vaccine Passports, Masks, Antisocial Distancing, Lockdowns, etc etc.
The ROOT CAUSE is ***the MF Virus***, which Del Bigtree, RFK Jr, & Reiner Fuellmich ALL PROMTE AS REAL while they CLAIM to be fighting the "Countermeasures".
That's not what I would call "not going far enough". They're in an airplane heading for Nome Alaska, when the destination was Miami.
They are not trying to solve the problem. They're playing a game.
I don't know what the game is exactly. I'm not going to speculate on their motivations...
But there's really no excuse. Reiner Fuellmich, and Bobby Kennedy are both two of the top attorneys in the world. These men are not stupid. Dell Bigtree is not stupid.
They all have massive budgets and I can only assume that they have major donors that are telling them to do this.
So one question is, who are their major donors? We should put pressure on them to get them to reveal this.
Because Children's Health Defense and ICAN had $3 million dollar budgets prior to COVID! You don't get $3 million dollar budgets on $20 donations. They both have some Fatcat Sugar Daddys paying their bills. Think about that.
I used to listen to an AMAZING blogger/commentator named Debbie/Sane Progressive. She was all over this before she vanished in 2018.
As an example, she talked about how Bernie Sanders was the Sheepdog for the Democratic party.
As people got fed up with the lies and the betrayal of the democratic party for the last 40 years, they would often look for an exit strategy, someplace else to go.
So long comes Bernie Sanders who seems like he's some kind of progressive and independent thinker that somehow exists within the party, sort of.
So vast numbers of people get seduced by his message into staying within the party... (Drumroll) ... Only to be ultimately betrayed by a con man to stay within the same criminal party for another four years.
Del Bigtree, Robert F Kennedy Jr, and Reiner Fuellmich are performing the EXACT SAME FUNCTION for Allopathic Medicine.
YES they have done a lot of good work exposing the harms of Vaccines.
HOWEVER, if we look a little deeper, we find something a bit more sinister.
As people get wise to the Criminal Fraud of Allopathic Medicine, along come the highly compensated SHEEPDOGS to seduce you into their FAKE oppositional narrative applied like a thin veneer, AS THEY PUSH the official Germ Theory narrative.
I'm going to write a blog about this, bc it keeps coming up.
To be more specific, plane flying from Denver to Nome when it's supposed to be headed to Miami. Plausible that you would fly to Nome before getting to Miami, if you're flying from Tokyo and are doing a great circle route. :-)
Indeed, Bigtree and his ilk are pushing "alternative treatments" for a virus not proven to exist and "bioweapon" narrative.
People are different than machines. There's a lot of brainwashing and cognitive dissonance. Sometimes seguing into information is a better approach. I work with the general public, talk to lots and lots of average people and just getting them to think a little bit different about something might get through the cognitive dissonance to get them curious and they can learn on their own.
People have to want to know and learn on their own. I don't listen to Del that often. It's sort of like the climate change thing too. That's gonna be another issue that comes up, "climate lockdown" I haven't even begun to look at the science in that arena.
He has had on numerous virus pushers pushing the existence of the virus, has done so himself. See the chart in the body of the article here.
FYI, im in Ryan (TLAV)'s discord group and followed him closely for awhile (and Derrick) - trying to bring more awareness to the NoVirus issue. The responses ive received have completely turned me off and I no longer engage with these so-called "investigative journalists"/"truth-seekers". I had a screenshot but I may have deleted it.
The reply was along the lines of what Del's excuse was. Basically that its too fantastical for the normies to believe, and therefore, is ignored because VIEWS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN TRUTH! Some of Ryan's direct responses to me & another guy who were ADAMANTLY & CONSISTENTLY trying to engage dialog really disgusted me. I wish I had saved them so I could quote word for word....
Ryan & Derrick are grifters. They pick & choose which topics they want to support. Ryan has also had Malone and several other "virus pushers against clot-shots" as Bill calls them (love the phrase by the way 😉) and puts these people up on a pedestal for some reason - also completely ignoring the OBVIOUS & GLARING red flags, if he were to ACTUALLY do his "due diligence" like he encourages his viewers to do.
Its not difficult to find this information about Malone, McCullough, etc, which is quite alarming considering they are self-proclaimed "leaders" or whatever of the "truth/health freedom" movement.
I have explained the importance of kicking down the virology house of cards to Ryan & group many times- rather than waste time trying to go over "tHe sCiEnCe™️" of masks, quackzines, lockdowns, treatment, ventilators, etc individually...... why wouldn't you kill all birds with 1 stone, if you had the means to do so? Its an easy & fast shortcut to truth and ultimately freedom. Instead, they dance around it, and would rather waste time picking apart each "measure/public health response", while also speaking positively of so-called treatments such as Ivermectin (which is essentially a poison), Hydroxycloroquine, etc. Its exhausting... I have spent literally 2 years trying to be patient & provide sources & data, encouraging Ryan to seriously look into terrain vs germ theory - at least spend the same amount of time researching that as he has any of the other topics. But he refuses. Because "it'll turn normies off", or whatever 🙄
I cant bother trying to engage with people like that anymore. Its a waste of my time.
Fascinating. How do you join that? Do you think it would do any good having another ally arguing the point with you? And do you get shouted down by trolls claiming you are cointel pro like on Bigtree's website, or is it at least civil discourse?
I donate a couple bucks a month through buy me a coffee and just haven't bothered cancelling in the couple months since i stopped watching. Might have to cancel and start sending that Bill's way instead :-)
As i said above, he had been vocally supportive of the no virus theory up until around 12 months ago so would love to know what changed. About the time Hudak started interviewing all the big names for him. I wonder if just more popular for his audience / business model.
I originally joined it from a direct link on his website. However, I heard it was removed because trolls were inviting themselves in or something. Now, I believe you need to be invited by a mod. If you catch one of his lives on YouTube pirate streams, you can ask a mod there. To be honest, I havent engaged with the group in..... 9 months? I was VERY active and then kinda disappeared overnight because I got so frustrated.
They dont pile on like a mob though. There are definitely some in the group that are genuinely open-minded & intrigued. Even one of his mods told me if I wanted to, I could send my research & she would make me a "channel" within the group to put it all. I thought about doing that, but then after some of the comments, I grew frustrated. Theres a few free-thinkers, but there are a lot of people that seem to let Ryan do their thinking for them. Since he hasnt taken it seriously, THEY dont take it seriously.
But by all means, if you can jump through the obstacles to get into the group and want to give it a try, maybe the tone has changed since I last visited.... my username on there is "Galactic Sirena" I think 🤔 (its been a while lol)
I will say that I met a handful of amazing people there. I just... idk... part of me feels like we are past the "information stage"... it is becoming a matter of life & death for many. If they have been exposed to this info, as a so-called truth/freedom-seeker, and glossed past it for whatever excuse they give, I tend to lose my patience with people after attempting for nearly 2 years. I guess for me, it was time to move on. Or take a break. I havent decided lol
Heh i know the feeling re your closing comments. Iv been watching Corbett for over a decade and TLAV for at least the first year of COVID. I mean lets be honest. Whatever reason the existence question isnt being handled, he did a huge amount of work covering everything else that first year in particular. But now, I'm pretty myopically focused on the existence question.
Think i might have seen you on live chat once or twice in the past. Plenty of irony in what you say about letting him do their thinking. The catch phrase is question everything, come to your own conclusions. But of course like any leader, if Jim Jones told his followers that, they would parrot it and wait for the next instruction!
Do tell who made the good doctors aware!
I will never tell!
It might be some vulgar crackpot with no post nominal letters, whose association might sully their good reputation. I wouldn't want to do that!
😉
🙏
haha
Good comment at the video page, as to how Del is making lots of money milking the virus cash cow, so why would he give that up.
Nice one.
I write to The Highwire and staff EVERY week. I am so disappointed in the continuous claim FOR the belief in pathogenic, exogenous, viruses. I try to be nice, but ... It is also annoying to see him parade people for whom we are supposed to feel sorry or empathy for being injured by the jabs.
Invariably, the "victims" are nurses, MDs. People who spent years poisoning babies and mothers and children.
I am also tried of Del giving us the idea that "the other vaccines are okay" - which is what RFK, Jr., always says. If someone like Michael Yeadon can see - in 2-3 hours, that his career in vaccinology and virology was horse crap, then all of us are ready for the truth.
Best
Very nice work Bill!
Right on! One thing I notice from my Mercola, CHD, and ICAN emails/sites is that in their comments sections, there is no one discussing anything about terrain theory or that fact that viruses have never been shown to exist outside of in silico computations. This seems highly unlikely to be natural and is due to censorship of this narrative. I mean look at all of us here on substack, telegram, odysee, and everywhere else. And so I suspect that Mercola and RFKjr are the top 2 in that NYT list for a reason?? And I dislike how Guillermou always rises to the top of the comments of any Mercola article with his well researched comments right after publication of an article. They are well-informed, but I'm just saying, it doesn't seem organic.
it is a conspiracy. few billions claiming to have some sort of sickness which does not exist. it is in their mind and from there it goes to their body.
maga!!!
> it is a conspiracy.
Yes, I believe it is.
>few billions claiming to have some sort of sickness
Yeah, so? People get sick all the time. Homo Sapiens have gotten sick for the entire 300,000 years that we've walked the earth.
> some sort of sickness which does not exist.
There you go again, pandelis, putting words in my mouth.
I NEVER SAID "no one got sick".
What I've maintained consistently is that (PAY CAREFUL ATTENTION!)
👉 "COVID Syndrome" has no new, unique or distinguishing clinical expression (Pneumonia is NOT a new syndrome)
👉 There was NEVER any rigorous etiology preformed to find the cause of the non-new, non-unique, non-distinguishing syndrome (including a search for a TOXIC cause, eg, Air Pollution or 5G)
👉 SARS-CoV-2 is fictitious, a computer model,
👉 There is NO TEST for the fictitious virus which has ever been calibrated to anything in the Real World
👉 The fictitious virus has never been proven to cause clinical disease
👉 THEREFORE, COVID DOES NOT EXIST!
If someone got sick somewhere,
then DO NOT CALL IT COVID.
Because THERE IS NO SUCH DISEASE.
bill - sorry, my bad. i said (not you!) none got sick.
if you get sick, get a few supplements ...
I'm not rehashing this with you again. We've been through this EXHAUSTIVELY. And i mean that literally. The Convo exhausted me.
If there's no SARS-COV-2, then there is no "spike protein" on the surface.
Stop bringing up fairy tales please because it's going to annoy me. And if you annoy me enough I'm going to block you.
I'm still waiting for that one scientific paper, using legitimate methods, where the spike protein was isolated and therefore proven to exist.
That is the ONLY thing that I will accept from you about it from here on forward.
And you better be damn sure that the methods are legitimate. Because if you waste my time again you're going to annoy me further.
lets agree to disagree on this point.
I don't take "supplements" or "vitamins". I don't believe in those things.
But feel free to put into your own body whatever you see fit and makes you feel good! To each his own. 😉
thank you for your reply! be well!
Supplements are about as fictitious as COVID. I mean sure, they exist. But they dont do what they're said to do. And the methods used to "isolate" vitamins are equivalent to the methods used to "isolate" so-called viruses.
Heres a podcast to get you started. You should throw away all of your supplements. Seriously.
https://odysee.com/@ALightOn:8/ep33:a
The word "spike" makes the avg person feel like something sharp will attack them. "Spikes" seen on EM are what's left of the vesicle surface after they are treated with trypsin that eats into the surface layer, like walking in the snow, you make holes but now the snow sticks out.
Of course there can be a protein made in a lab LABELED as "spike", and zillions of papers can be written about these sets of proteins, but we know that the propaganda makers are very good at crafting all kinds of stories to deceive you. Unless shown otherwise, I dont think there is any specific spike protein found in shot vials, nor mRNA, nor is there a dose-response curve of mRNA to spike protein study, nor any of these things found in people who received shots. It seems that all this is a cover for graphene and LNPs that hold graphene in the shots. The Japan biodisribution study looked at LNPs not spikes-because there is no spike. I will admit I fell for the mRNA-Spike story for at least a year even though I knew there was no virus, so there is no shame in learning and updating our ideas as new info comes in. There is a very clever and crafty info game going on to hide the Trojan horse.
Thanks for the feedback.
I don't see what you mean. Both look fine to me.
Wow, that's weird.
Thx.
Maybe update your browser? Or try a different one?
No worries, mate!