Donated a few bucks Bill. Sorry i cant do more. Great resources. Glad I've found you in the last few months as all interest in most of the people I've been following for the last 18 months has disappeared as they all out themselves. Not for the non-crime of believing in viruses, but for the crime of wanting to silence debate on the issue, while shedding crocodile tears on the silencing of their own debates by more mainstream outlets. Your chronicling and collecting of relevant links and articles is great. long may it continue.
You were sad for Poornima a day ago. I hope you no longer are. I guess there is still the outside chance she is quite mentally ill, but short of that this all seems very nefarious indeed.
Excellent, diligent work on all of your parts! Well done! I am glad the veil is being lifted from all of our eyes and we have learned that proper vetting is important! The messenger is equally as important as the message. If the deliverer has no integrity, it is lacking. They shouldn’t be pushed to the forefront of a movement… there is an agenda here IMO
Aug 31, 2022·edited Aug 31, 2022Liked by Bill Huston
She said she was looking for a publisher. I am interested to hear why she wouldn't publish through one of the preprint sites and/or present it to Cowan et. al. and collaborate with them to make it available to their audience. If she tested 1,500 or even 756 samples, and found no virus, that would go a long way to casting serious doubts upon virology.
No kidding. The fact that she hasn't realized by now that no "mainstream" publisher would touch that with a 10 foot pole, is also concerning. She can't possibly be that naive.
Also interesting since she has never published anything else in her life - with 2 PhD's 😉
If Poornima Wagh's science is questionable, let's redo the analysis of the vaccines and see what they actually contain. Without such scrutiny and careful attention, our public health program risks more fatal errors. Poornima might be touting BS, and yet we know all fiction rests on fact of some sort. Ignore the warning at your peril. Without a transparent verification of vaccine contents the public has no alternative but to seek the advertised "safe and effective" protection naively from a corrupt industry funding a corrupt bureaucracy.
And No, the CHARADE is NOT OVER - it continues with those extremely lethal injections. I have so many people injured and killed by those "vaccines" - but anything is good to discredit the real reason for those adverse reactions - graphene
Even, if SHE IS A FEUD, she correctly claimed that those injections contain sorts of toxic ingredients that should have never been there - not just graphene, but plenty of others.
The reason behind those injections is Internet of Things, Bodies and Viruses - and GRAPHENED is used everywhere.
We have plenty of "experts" with real PhDs and they LIE about need, safety and effectiveness of those killing shots.
So, she was closer to the truth than those who prescribe Remdesivir, insert "PCR tests" into people's brain and kill with all those mandates, injections, lockdowns, economic distress, etc.
Even, if she would be just crazy - apparently SHE IS RIGHT
I don't think you understand the level of Psychological Warfare Operations we are under now.
It DOES NOT MATTER if what she is saying is Mostly Correct, if she's hiding a big secret -- like fraudulent credentials, or that maybe she's a Big Pharma plant.
That's the HOOK.
Go reread the Nurse Rose quote above.
It's all part of the PSYOP playbook. "Reveal the Truth through an unreliable source".
This is why the big gatekeepers love and tolerate Alex Jones' schtick and let him slide for decades. He reveals a lot of truth, but with a maniacal persona. Which allows plausible deniability.
yes, I don't need "Purinima" to tell me what I already KNOW. So yes, you are right. But I can see on different platforms many people already see and understand it and yes, they KNOW graphene has been used and those injections are finished even for many who initially took them
Omar, I haven't focused on the why because I have no idea. And neither do you.
You can speculate. You can guess. You can have a hunch of suspicion based on your life experiences, observations, and historical context. You can have an opinion....
But you're stating that as a material fact. And as far as I know, you have no proof of that.
I do try to practice journalism, which means only reporting on things that I can prove with evidence and documentation.
So the WHY is much less interesting to me than the WHAT.
To answer the why, we have to get inside the person's head and see their intentions and motivations. Unless they tell us this directly, these things are hidden from our view.
So I try to stay out of a person's head, and stick to their actions, what I can see with my own eyes.
Already subscribing, Bill. Sorry i can't do more, got my own fin crisis.
I wish you were right that the charade is OVER. Some people on FB are clinging to her, they'll do anything except admit they were snookered. And they counter all these revelations by calling the whistle blowers chauvinist white males who are jealous of Poornima and are wedded to hyper-rationalism vs intuition.
I hope you and your buddies have a good lawyer. You can question her but without proof, not your opinion, you cannot accuse her of fraud. You are doing exactly what you claim she is doing. She doesn’t have to succumb to a bunch of threatened do nothings demands.
Her alleged alma mater, where she says she obtained 2x PhDs, says they never awarded ONE PhD to any Poornima Wagh, let alone two.
I've used great restraint up until now. I WANTED to believe her. I advocated to my group of researchers that we should use great restraint, and maybe say nothing at all, when others were saying "expose her now, before she does more damage."
This was when we only had a giant pile of anomalies which didn't add up -- no definitive proof.
But now we HAVE definitive proof.
TRUST ME, I would not use the word FRAUD in a cavalier manner.
Speaking as someone from Eastern Europe who can't stand the western anti-communism, sen McCarthy was right in his fascism because most of those who accused of being communists or with communist ties, ... WERE communist! His accusations weren't false. And, given the Cold War, they had relevance for your country's security.
And, when we look at the McCarthy 'witch hunts' compared to what happens in our times - the most egregious excesses of the US government, - and the tragedies in Eastern Europe in the mid-twentieth century, ... give me a break.
He barely registers.
McCarthy is seen as a big villain mainly thanks to the incessant western liberals blathering.
To be clear, for you Westerners communists are an inverted Santa Claus:
The communism you believe in and talk about is mostly a stuff of fantasies.
Grover Furr does a good job in debunking them, and so do a number of authors at unz.com
Donated a few bucks Bill. Sorry i cant do more. Great resources. Glad I've found you in the last few months as all interest in most of the people I've been following for the last 18 months has disappeared as they all out themselves. Not for the non-crime of believing in viruses, but for the crime of wanting to silence debate on the issue, while shedding crocodile tears on the silencing of their own debates by more mainstream outlets. Your chronicling and collecting of relevant links and articles is great. long may it continue.
You were sad for Poornima a day ago. I hope you no longer are. I guess there is still the outside chance she is quite mentally ill, but short of that this all seems very nefarious indeed.
Thank you Nick.
Thank you for your kind words!
I appreciate donations in any amount.
Excellent, diligent work on all of your parts! Well done! I am glad the veil is being lifted from all of our eyes and we have learned that proper vetting is important! The messenger is equally as important as the message. If the deliverer has no integrity, it is lacking. They shouldn’t be pushed to the forefront of a movement… there is an agenda here IMO
Well thats not surprising. Something about her stunk from day 1 for me. Why the hell did she wait 2 1/2 years to come out with this story!?!?!?
She said she was looking for a publisher. I am interested to hear why she wouldn't publish through one of the preprint sites and/or present it to Cowan et. al. and collaborate with them to make it available to their audience. If she tested 1,500 or even 756 samples, and found no virus, that would go a long way to casting serious doubts upon virology.
No kidding. The fact that she hasn't realized by now that no "mainstream" publisher would touch that with a 10 foot pole, is also concerning. She can't possibly be that naive.
Also interesting since she has never published anything else in her life - with 2 PhD's 😉
If Poornima Wagh's science is questionable, let's redo the analysis of the vaccines and see what they actually contain. Without such scrutiny and careful attention, our public health program risks more fatal errors. Poornima might be touting BS, and yet we know all fiction rests on fact of some sort. Ignore the warning at your peril. Without a transparent verification of vaccine contents the public has no alternative but to seek the advertised "safe and effective" protection naively from a corrupt industry funding a corrupt bureaucracy.
http://sealevel.ca/ocean/open.htm
Did you see her latest video on bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/TLzvSvcj5aw4/
She put slides together and everything. I'm going to actually listen to what she's saying. I don't think she's being paid by the government.
I don't think she's honest about her education, but wondering if has worked in labs.
And No, the CHARADE is NOT OVER - it continues with those extremely lethal injections. I have so many people injured and killed by those "vaccines" - but anything is good to discredit the real reason for those adverse reactions - graphene
Even, if SHE IS A FEUD, she correctly claimed that those injections contain sorts of toxic ingredients that should have never been there - not just graphene, but plenty of others.
The reason behind those injections is Internet of Things, Bodies and Viruses - and GRAPHENED is used everywhere.
We have plenty of "experts" with real PhDs and they LIE about need, safety and effectiveness of those killing shots.
So, she was closer to the truth than those who prescribe Remdesivir, insert "PCR tests" into people's brain and kill with all those mandates, injections, lockdowns, economic distress, etc.
Even, if she would be just crazy - apparently SHE IS RIGHT
I don't think you understand the level of Psychological Warfare Operations we are under now.
It DOES NOT MATTER if what she is saying is Mostly Correct, if she's hiding a big secret -- like fraudulent credentials, or that maybe she's a Big Pharma plant.
That's the HOOK.
Go reread the Nurse Rose quote above.
It's all part of the PSYOP playbook. "Reveal the Truth through an unreliable source".
This is why the big gatekeepers love and tolerate Alex Jones' schtick and let him slide for decades. He reveals a lot of truth, but with a maniacal persona. Which allows plausible deniability.
Yes, it really looks like too many people understood what's going on.
Myself, I know most of the studies on toxicity of graphene and plenty on graphene. I know it is used. I know this is pandemic of toxicity of graphene.
More, I know what causes (and thus how to treat) "vax" injuries and so called Covid. In practice and it works.
yes, I don't need "Purinima" to tell me what I already KNOW. So yes, you are right. But I can see on different platforms many people already see and understand it and yes, they KNOW graphene has been used and those injections are finished even for many who initially took them
I understand the reasons you all have not focused on WHY she's doing this (and respect them).
So, allow me, because the WHY is just as important and there is a valuable lesson to be learned here.
WHY do you suppose she did this? Just because?
Of course not - SHE WORKS FOR INTELLIGENCE.
Omar, I haven't focused on the why because I have no idea. And neither do you.
You can speculate. You can guess. You can have a hunch of suspicion based on your life experiences, observations, and historical context. You can have an opinion....
But you're stating that as a material fact. And as far as I know, you have no proof of that.
I do try to practice journalism, which means only reporting on things that I can prove with evidence and documentation.
So the WHY is much less interesting to me than the WHAT.
To answer the why, we have to get inside the person's head and see their intentions and motivations. Unless they tell us this directly, these things are hidden from our view.
So I try to stay out of a person's head, and stick to their actions, what I can see with my own eyes.
https://moonmaiden.substack.com/p/is-fuellmich-positioning-to-prop
Already subscribing, Bill. Sorry i can't do more, got my own fin crisis.
I wish you were right that the charade is OVER. Some people on FB are clinging to her, they'll do anything except admit they were snookered. And they counter all these revelations by calling the whistle blowers chauvinist white males who are jealous of Poornima and are wedded to hyper-rationalism vs intuition.
I hope you and your buddies have a good lawyer. You can question her but without proof, not your opinion, you cannot accuse her of fraud. You are doing exactly what you claim she is doing. She doesn’t have to succumb to a bunch of threatened do nothings demands.
MY GOD!
"Without Proof"!?
Did you read the post?
Her alleged alma mater, where she says she obtained 2x PhDs, says they never awarded ONE PhD to any Poornima Wagh, let alone two.
I've used great restraint up until now. I WANTED to believe her. I advocated to my group of researchers that we should use great restraint, and maybe say nothing at all, when others were saying "expose her now, before she does more damage."
This was when we only had a giant pile of anomalies which didn't add up -- no definitive proof.
But now we HAVE definitive proof.
TRUST ME, I would not use the word FRAUD in a cavalier manner.
What will it take to convince you?
What more proof do you need?
what giant pile?
Sounds like you are reaching
you just said 99% of what she says is truth
I did? I can't find 99% anywhere in this thread other than here.
Just look at her blog post today, sen McCarthy was right in his fascism.
Never mind that he did exactly what the pharma cartel does today.
That explains her response to you.
Thanks for your sleuthing. Keep on trucking
McCarthy was right
fascism?
Wtf are you talking about
see this is the exact kind of shilling id expect
Wtf is that wven supposed to mean fascism?
Good lord
Speaking as someone from Eastern Europe who can't stand the western anti-communism, sen McCarthy was right in his fascism because most of those who accused of being communists or with communist ties, ... WERE communist! His accusations weren't false. And, given the Cold War, they had relevance for your country's security.
And, when we look at the McCarthy 'witch hunts' compared to what happens in our times - the most egregious excesses of the US government, - and the tragedies in Eastern Europe in the mid-twentieth century, ... give me a break.
He barely registers.
McCarthy is seen as a big villain mainly thanks to the incessant western liberals blathering.
To be clear, for you Westerners communists are an inverted Santa Claus:
The communism you believe in and talk about is mostly a stuff of fantasies.
Grover Furr does a good job in debunking them, and so do a number of authors at unz.com
I can't believe someone brought up Grover Furr.
You get a big hat tip for that.
Most don't understand the role the liberals played in aiding and abetting McCarthy.
okay, Karen
Watch the Deep Sh$t MSM now pick up the "Dr Wagh" story...