Ray McGovern: Biden's Sabotage of Nord Stream Pipeline "an impeachable offense" and an illegal Act of War against Germany & Russia
Ray McGovern discusses Seymour Hersch's bombshell report
This is essential listening:
Ray McGovern:
“Now this was an act of War pure and simple…”
“The Biden Administration admitted that what they were doing was an Act of War, which means they understood that only Congress could in fact constitutionally clear that action. And they, with malice aforethought, took action to mitigate their accountability to the Constitution and Congress. And Joe Biden was the head guy there. He was the man that eventually they decided, rather than just put explosives on it, apparently Biden wanted to give the word for when it was done. This is an impeachable offense.”
Here is Sy Hersch’s report:
Background:
US President Joe Biden:
"If Russia invades -- that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine, again -- then there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2."
Ambassador Victoria Nuland, Under Secretary for Political Affairs, US Department of State:
We continue to have a very strong and clear conversations with our German allies, and I want to be clear with you today: If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.”
CNN & US Officials try to blame Russia for sabotaging their own pipeline!
Victoria Nuland:
”Senator Cruz, like you, I am, and I think the administration is very gratified to know that Nordstrom 2 is now, as you like to say, ‘a hunk of metal at the bottom of the sea’ ….”
Hi Bill. This entire piece assumes the veracity of Seymour Hersh. He has done some great work in the past, starting in 1969 with breaking the story of the My Lai massacre in Vietnam by US troops (Lt Bill Calley commanding them). But his penchant for accuracy has been notable in its absence in more recent years. Here he is, with a 2015 book about the alleged killing of Osama bin Laden, completely buying the core official 9/11 story , i.e. this was an attack by 19 hijackers commanded by bin Laden upon the US. Still buying the utter nonsense, 14 years later.
https://qz.com/402375/one-question-seymour-hersh-never-answers-in-his-alt-history-of-the-killing-of-osama-bin-laden
Hi Bill, let me ask your opinions:
1. Are Putin and Biden etc on the same team making conflict and thus econ disaster as a pretext to usher in the One World Govt. or are they against each other?
2. Would Russia be expected to have tight water and air/satellite surveillance along the entire pipeline and not miss the attack or is it possible they don't have surveillance on that?
3. If it is a covert-op how can we know about it in a dozen weeks (we still don't have the definitive JFK leak after 60 years), or is the "leak" and article by Hersch part of war propaganda?
4. Do you think we should take Hersch at face value and is there some question about his affiliation with the NYT (which is a mainstream and controlled intel outlet) which might bring his credibility to question?
Related, is Simon Hersch of the NYT on the reference below on page 81 the same as Seymour or a misspelling?:
"Simon Hersh, a British intelligence agent working for the New York Times, which has been a British intelligence mouthpiece in the U.S. since the time that M16 boss, Sir William Stephenson, occupied the RCA building in New York." True, Seymour is American, but you can still be American and be a British Intel agent (cant find much about a "Simon" Hersch). In any case, the NYT is thought to be controlled by TPTB.
Reference: https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/4A/4A92FD2FB4DAE3F773DB0B7742CF0F65_Coleman.-.CONSPIRATORS.HIERARCHY.-.THE.STORY.OF.THE.COMMITTEE.OF.300.R.pdf
Also see Hersch's books even on his Wiki page to get an idea about him. Here, he pushes the Hijackers crashed planes into the WTC narrative (He's a "Hijacker pusher against the Bush Admin").
https://www.amazon.com/Chain-Command-Road-Abu-Ghraib/dp/0060195916
I don't trust that this guy writes things without a propaganda purpose.
5. Why do you think the US announced intent to attack if Russia invaded?, ie to drum up expectation of expanded conflict with Russia and thus econ disaster or just to put pressure on Putin? To me, threatening Putin directly doesn't seem like a great idea if he is really an enemy.
6. Importantly, is there any proof that the pipeline was blown up more than just an explosion at sea, or do we only have reports from the news, Hersch, and maybe Russian news?
I'm not saying I have all the answers, except to say I would not take the info by Hersch at face value without more data.