Hi Bill. This entire piece assumes the veracity of Seymour Hersh. He has done some great work in the past, starting in 1969 with breaking the story of the My Lai massacre in Vietnam by US troops (Lt Bill Calley commanding them). But his penchant for accuracy has been notable in its absence in more recent years. Here he is, with a 2015 book about the alleged killing of Osama bin Laden, completely buying the core official 9/11 story , i.e. this was an attack by 19 hijackers commanded by bin Laden upon the US. Still buying the utter nonsense, 14 years later.
1. Are Putin and Biden etc on the same team making conflict and thus econ disaster as a pretext to usher in the One World Govt. or are they against each other?
2. Would Russia be expected to have tight water and air/satellite surveillance along the entire pipeline and not miss the attack or is it possible they don't have surveillance on that?
3. If it is a covert-op how can we know about it in a dozen weeks (we still don't have the definitive JFK leak after 60 years), or is the "leak" and article by Hersch part of war propaganda?
4. Do you think we should take Hersch at face value and is there some question about his affiliation with the NYT (which is a mainstream and controlled intel outlet) which might bring his credibility to question?
Related, is Simon Hersch of the NYT on the reference below on page 81 the same as Seymour or a misspelling?:
"Simon Hersh, a British intelligence agent working for the New York Times, which has been a British intelligence mouthpiece in the U.S. since the time that M16 boss, Sir William Stephenson, occupied the RCA building in New York." True, Seymour is American, but you can still be American and be a British Intel agent (cant find much about a "Simon" Hersch). In any case, the NYT is thought to be controlled by TPTB.
Also see Hersch's books even on his Wiki page to get an idea about him. Here, he pushes the Hijackers crashed planes into the WTC narrative (He's a "Hijacker pusher against the Bush Admin").
I don't trust that this guy writes things without a propaganda purpose.
5. Why do you think the US announced intent to attack if Russia invaded?, ie to drum up expectation of expanded conflict with Russia and thus econ disaster or just to put pressure on Putin? To me, threatening Putin directly doesn't seem like a great idea if he is really an enemy.
6. Importantly, is there any proof that the pipeline was blown up more than just an explosion at sea, or do we only have reports from the news, Hersch, and maybe Russian news?
I'm not saying I have all the answers, except to say I would not take the info by Hersch at face value without more data.
these are exaggerated views sort of seeking the find a needle in a haystack. most likely this was an act of nature or i wouldnt eliminate the possibility of an alien interference. the balloon in US is being blamed on chinese ... what about the other objects that keep showing up over US ??? the chinese rise by peaceful means ... free competition in peace!
"The Committee of 300 set up the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). This is the vehicle for M16-Tavistock black propaganda which goes to the world's press for dissemination. The Mai Lai massacre story published by Seymour Hersh came straight out of IISS, just in case we wrongly suppose that men like Hersh do their own research work."
Another Tavistock operative Adorno wrote the Beatles Songs and others. Beatles or Hersch take your pick, you end up at the Tavistock Institute for black propaganda.
Hi Bill. This entire piece assumes the veracity of Seymour Hersh. He has done some great work in the past, starting in 1969 with breaking the story of the My Lai massacre in Vietnam by US troops (Lt Bill Calley commanding them). But his penchant for accuracy has been notable in its absence in more recent years. Here he is, with a 2015 book about the alleged killing of Osama bin Laden, completely buying the core official 9/11 story , i.e. this was an attack by 19 hijackers commanded by bin Laden upon the US. Still buying the utter nonsense, 14 years later.
https://qz.com/402375/one-question-seymour-hersh-never-answers-in-his-alt-history-of-the-killing-of-osama-bin-laden
Hi Bill, let me ask your opinions:
1. Are Putin and Biden etc on the same team making conflict and thus econ disaster as a pretext to usher in the One World Govt. or are they against each other?
2. Would Russia be expected to have tight water and air/satellite surveillance along the entire pipeline and not miss the attack or is it possible they don't have surveillance on that?
3. If it is a covert-op how can we know about it in a dozen weeks (we still don't have the definitive JFK leak after 60 years), or is the "leak" and article by Hersch part of war propaganda?
4. Do you think we should take Hersch at face value and is there some question about his affiliation with the NYT (which is a mainstream and controlled intel outlet) which might bring his credibility to question?
Related, is Simon Hersch of the NYT on the reference below on page 81 the same as Seymour or a misspelling?:
"Simon Hersh, a British intelligence agent working for the New York Times, which has been a British intelligence mouthpiece in the U.S. since the time that M16 boss, Sir William Stephenson, occupied the RCA building in New York." True, Seymour is American, but you can still be American and be a British Intel agent (cant find much about a "Simon" Hersch). In any case, the NYT is thought to be controlled by TPTB.
Reference: https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/4A/4A92FD2FB4DAE3F773DB0B7742CF0F65_Coleman.-.CONSPIRATORS.HIERARCHY.-.THE.STORY.OF.THE.COMMITTEE.OF.300.R.pdf
Also see Hersch's books even on his Wiki page to get an idea about him. Here, he pushes the Hijackers crashed planes into the WTC narrative (He's a "Hijacker pusher against the Bush Admin").
https://www.amazon.com/Chain-Command-Road-Abu-Ghraib/dp/0060195916
I don't trust that this guy writes things without a propaganda purpose.
5. Why do you think the US announced intent to attack if Russia invaded?, ie to drum up expectation of expanded conflict with Russia and thus econ disaster or just to put pressure on Putin? To me, threatening Putin directly doesn't seem like a great idea if he is really an enemy.
6. Importantly, is there any proof that the pipeline was blown up more than just an explosion at sea, or do we only have reports from the news, Hersch, and maybe Russian news?
I'm not saying I have all the answers, except to say I would not take the info by Hersch at face value without more data.
these are exaggerated views sort of seeking the find a needle in a haystack. most likely this was an act of nature or i wouldnt eliminate the possibility of an alien interference. the balloon in US is being blamed on chinese ... what about the other objects that keep showing up over US ??? the chinese rise by peaceful means ... free competition in peace!
Sorry to add, Coleman P.135 (redacted):
"The Committee of 300 set up the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). This is the vehicle for M16-Tavistock black propaganda which goes to the world's press for dissemination. The Mai Lai massacre story published by Seymour Hersh came straight out of IISS, just in case we wrongly suppose that men like Hersh do their own research work."
Another Tavistock operative Adorno wrote the Beatles Songs and others. Beatles or Hersch take your pick, you end up at the Tavistock Institute for black propaganda.