Steve Kirsch says: "They have $500K. They could EASILY fund their challenge and do it. Why don’t they? We don’t know because they won’t answer that question."
He is betting $1M that the virus exists and has stated virus skeptics are nutcases and whackjobs, so not much of a chance he would endorse the statement. He would prefer to continue with his lack of evidence and wagers.
Yeah, basically he's IGNORING the "Settling the Virus Debate" proposal to validate virology. He somehow sees this as nearly life-threatening. It's root chakra stuff.
So I'm guessing he's got some grift going. He's somehow profiting from the continued existence of the con. If the con dies, then Steve Dies.
Thus, his personal attacks, grandiose bloviating, and hubristic flapping "Look at me! Win a Million Smackers!" OMG. That level-11 ego makes me want to vomit. I think he's having a mental breakdown.
Steve with his VSRF (Vaccine Safety Research Foundation), like Del Bigtree and RFK Jr. have built organizations that depend on the existence of a virus. If there is no virus, their reason to be evaporates and they would have to pivot very quickly to retain their supporters, if they could at all. They would rather trim the leaves than cut down the tree. It is not just science for them, it is self and identity preservation.
Is the team aware of Poornima Wagh? She is a PhD in virology and immunology. She did isolation on 1500 samples the proper way and didn't find any viruses, only human cell debris. She had six other labs confirm her results. https://www.bitchute.com/video/btuJXs0glmla/
She tried to publish her results but no one would accept her paper.
Yes, everyone is excited to meet Poornima. She was the subject of a lot of discussion last weekend. I think Eric is going to play an excerpt of that show on his.
I'm personally not sharing her stuff, as I have some questions about her. I'm going to hold off until she's vetted a little bit more by people over my paygrade.
I still think it is possible they can create a virus in the lab. That doesn't mean it is transmissible or causes disease, but if they can create other proteins, why not SARS-COV-2?
> That doesn't mean it is transmissible or causes disease,
That's like saying "unicorn bites are not harmful". The most important thing to say about Unicorns is that they are FICTITIOUS.
> but if they can create other proteins, why not SARS-COV-2?
A virus is (purportedly) more than just a protein. They claim it's DNA or RNA encased in a lipid nanoparticle coated with receptor molecules (such as "ACE-2") which purportedly unlock the cell for being parasitized.
Have you looked at https://virusesarenotcontagious.com/ His thesis is that viruses exist, but they are garbage bags for cells to encase toxic material. Of course there will be no studies to prove his point as the studies are focused on what the establishment says are contagious viruses. There is a problem with terminology. Virus is usually taken to mean contagious, but that has not been proven.
If they can create spike proteins in the lab, why not viruses? Maybe they can't create spike proteins in the lab, I don't know. What I am fairly certain of is that they can create toxic proteins in the lab. When they put those in a quackcine, it has the potential to harm those who take it.
According to Harvey Lodish, et al., in Molecular Cell Biology, 4th ed, (2000), the definition of ‘virus’ is: “A small parasite consisting of nucleic acid (RNA or DNA) enclosed in a protein coat that can
replicate only in a susceptible host cell.” These things either EXIST or the DO NOT EXIST. That is the question.
It is POINTLESS to talk about whether these particles are contagious or not UNTIL WE FIRST PROVE THAT THEY EXIST.
Steve Kirsch says: "They have $500K. They could EASILY fund their challenge and do it. Why don’t they? We don’t know because they won’t answer that question."
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/if-viruses-dont-exist-then-how-can
Is he misrepresenting?
Yes. Tom Cowan says he has secured a significant pledge of funding towards the cost.
The funding at this point is a RED HERRING. Steve has to make everything about money. That's what he understands.
The question is, will Steve Kirsch endorse the statement? Why or why not?
He is betting $1M that the virus exists and has stated virus skeptics are nutcases and whackjobs, so not much of a chance he would endorse the statement. He would prefer to continue with his lack of evidence and wagers.
Yeah, basically he's IGNORING the "Settling the Virus Debate" proposal to validate virology. He somehow sees this as nearly life-threatening. It's root chakra stuff.
So I'm guessing he's got some grift going. He's somehow profiting from the continued existence of the con. If the con dies, then Steve Dies.
Thus, his personal attacks, grandiose bloviating, and hubristic flapping "Look at me! Win a Million Smackers!" OMG. That level-11 ego makes me want to vomit. I think he's having a mental breakdown.
Steve has his way, and we have ours. For my part, I will continue to ask for papers that prove what they claim.
Steve with his VSRF (Vaccine Safety Research Foundation), like Del Bigtree and RFK Jr. have built organizations that depend on the existence of a virus. If there is no virus, their reason to be evaporates and they would have to pivot very quickly to retain their supporters, if they could at all. They would rather trim the leaves than cut down the tree. It is not just science for them, it is self and identity preservation.
Is the team aware of Poornima Wagh? She is a PhD in virology and immunology. She did isolation on 1500 samples the proper way and didn't find any viruses, only human cell debris. She had six other labs confirm her results. https://www.bitchute.com/video/btuJXs0glmla/
She tried to publish her results but no one would accept her paper.
Eric Coppolino will have a segment on his show tonight. http://www.planetwaves.net/mailings/220715-pwfm.html
Yes, everyone is excited to meet Poornima. She was the subject of a lot of discussion last weekend. I think Eric is going to play an excerpt of that show on his.
I'm personally not sharing her stuff, as I have some questions about her. I'm going to hold off until she's vetted a little bit more by people over my paygrade.
I still think it is possible they can create a virus in the lab. That doesn't mean it is transmissible or causes disease, but if they can create other proteins, why not SARS-COV-2?
> I still think it is possible they can create a virus in the lab.
You are saying we humans have created a pathogenic particle which God Herself didn't do?
There is no proof viruses exist, natural or otherwise. I recommend listing to more Tom Cowan, Andy Kaufman, Sam Bailey, Stefan Lanka, etc.
Tom Cowan DESTROYS the entire narrative in under 2 minutes:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fL5z8ZT6Hx5u/
> That doesn't mean it is transmissible or causes disease,
That's like saying "unicorn bites are not harmful". The most important thing to say about Unicorns is that they are FICTITIOUS.
> but if they can create other proteins, why not SARS-COV-2?
A virus is (purportedly) more than just a protein. They claim it's DNA or RNA encased in a lipid nanoparticle coated with receptor molecules (such as "ACE-2") which purportedly unlock the cell for being parasitized.
Have you looked at https://virusesarenotcontagious.com/ His thesis is that viruses exist, but they are garbage bags for cells to encase toxic material. Of course there will be no studies to prove his point as the studies are focused on what the establishment says are contagious viruses. There is a problem with terminology. Virus is usually taken to mean contagious, but that has not been proven.
If they can create spike proteins in the lab, why not viruses? Maybe they can't create spike proteins in the lab, I don't know. What I am fairly certain of is that they can create toxic proteins in the lab. When they put those in a quackcine, it has the potential to harm those who take it.
Have you ever seen a "Lab created Unicorn"?
Or a "Lab created Jackalope"?
or a "Lab created Sasquatch"?
NO, because those things DO NOT EXIST.
Unicorns, Jackalopes, and Sasquatch are FICTIONS.
just like SARS-CoV-2
According to Harvey Lodish, et al., in Molecular Cell Biology, 4th ed, (2000), the definition of ‘virus’ is: “A small parasite consisting of nucleic acid (RNA or DNA) enclosed in a protein coat that can
replicate only in a susceptible host cell.” These things either EXIST or the DO NOT EXIST. That is the question.
It is POINTLESS to talk about whether these particles are contagious or not UNTIL WE FIRST PROVE THAT THEY EXIST.