22 Comments
User's avatar
Sanjoy Mahajan's avatar

Convid is a psychological disease, fear. And Ivermectin treats the fear. So, if I cannot convince someone that the whole virus and pandemic are fake, I just don’t argue with them about their favored “early treatments.” It’s better for them to have the security blanket and keep their cortex (which fear would disable).

Roman S Shapoval's avatar

The only antidote to a psychological disease is compassion and understanding, aka shaking one's head when another says they're taking ivermectin. Our bodies already have an amazing machinery of immunity. In my opinion, trusting in our bodies is trusting in the divine.

Jeffrey Strahl's avatar

GREAT collection of articles, Bill, quite an encyclopedia version of a cautionary note. Damn all these "resistance" people who are pushing or clinging on to this nefarious chemical.

Jo Waller's avatar

Thanks Bill

Jo

pandelis's avatar

i would be careful ....

Bill Huston's avatar

Gates Foundation has given MILLIONS to Ivermectin research:

https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Agatesfoundation.org+ivermectin

But again, all you need is LOGIC. If you understand COVID is not a real disease, then you also know that you don't need ANY therapy to treat or prevent it, especially an ACUTELY TOXIC "cure"!!

Proton Magic's avatar

He's just a puppet and monster, IBM helped him make Microsoft, he's just a slurping silver spoons Globalist, he doesnt know how to code anything.

Question Everything's avatar

You ever see that interview of him when Microsoft got sued for violating anti-trust laws.... he looks so disturbed - autistic-like. He is rocking back & forth for SEVERAL minutes in between questioning, very slow to respond. Almost like he was just... slow. Y'know, retarded, mentally handicapped.

It is VASTLY different from the Bill Gates we see today when interviewed. I always wondered how/what was able to give him such a massive transformation. Its very odd. Maybe this is common knowledge and ive just not looked into it enough. But I think about this sometimes - I think about that young guy being interviewed, rocking back & forth - and wonder how someone like that becomes the evil villain we know & hate today....

Proton Magic's avatar

Hearing from people that have worked at MS HQ, he has always been aggressive and demeaning and berating staff. My GUESS is that his rocking interview was trained acting to seem distressed and immature and to throw the interviewer off-guard. His image has been molded in many PR stunts and public performances. All of the black Generals of the Comm of 300 (Fauci, Soros, even Trump, Obama, Bushes and Musk) are indoctrinated, trained, and PR'd from head to toe--as a side effect, and also as a criteria to get those positions, they had to be a bit disturbed from very young.

Christine the Strawberry Girl's avatar

And a college dropout eugenicist...

Kaleb's avatar

Ignore everything that this Bill Huston writes. He is a manipulative crook who is probably being paid to smear people and create fake narratives.

Kaleb's avatar

You're a disgusting human being. The only people you are fooling are ignorant sheep.

You should stop going after good people and mind your own business, I think that would be a smart thing for you to do.

ABIGAIL REPORTS's avatar

When I had a Diverticulitis attack I was given a ant-parasitic Flagal. Very much in the same group as Stromecol or Ivermeticin. No argument, while the vision side effects were bad, it worked.

TheRealLisa's avatar

Can I ask what the vision-related side-effects were for you?

ABIGAIL REPORTS's avatar

My vision went real blurry and took weeks to go back to my normal. I'm the main driver as my Hub has Retinal Atrophy and severe Glaucoma.

What they don't tell those who get Catracts removed is they develop Dry Eyes, same goes for Lasix's. I had to have the messed up Catract implant in one eye corrected, and Lasik is the fix. Add in lots of computer time you forget to blink, and your eyes get super dry. I now need new lenses yearly. Age doesn't help it.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Feb 12, 2023
Comment removed
Bill Huston's avatar

It's really simple.

1: Ivermectin is in a class of compounds called ACUTELY TOXIC. The common use is as an INSECTICIDE. Bug killer. It kills Roundworms, and Lungworms, Grubs, horn flies, and sucking lice. It kills biting lice, and sarcoptic mange mites in cattle. And let's not forget Onchocerca Volvulus Worms! (well, the larval fileria anyway. Not the adult worms.) GUESS WHAT? YOUR cells and worms cells are not that different. Something toxic to bugs and worms is most likely toxic to YOU.

2: YOU DO NOT NEED IT TO "CURE YOUR COVID", because COVID **DOES NOT EXIST**!

How many times do we have to go over this?

👉NO Pathognomonic Syndrome!

👉NO Rigorous Etiology!

👉NO Isolated Suspect Pathogen

👉NO PROOF the Phantom Pathogen causes the Non-Distinguishing Syndrome!

👉NO TEST for Phantom Pathogen calibrated to Real-World Certified Reference Materials

👉NO Clinical Diagnosis for the Non-Distinguishing Syndrome

Therefore,

👉There is NO OBJECTIVE DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA for COVID!

👉There is NO DISEASE called COVID

So tell me, WHY AGAIN are you EATING an ACUTELY TOXIC INSECTICIDE?

👉Positive PCR test?

👉To cure your sniffles? (what about water, lemon-honey tea, or some orange juice?)

👉Feeling or hunch?

👉You saw on Joe Rogan that Eating Literal Insecticide was good for you, and would cure your CONVID?

Question Everything's avatar

It seems to me that you didn't read any of the other links or watch any of the other videos that Bill provided above to supplement his article.

If you had, it should begin to paint a picture about just how truly toxic & sinister the Ivermectin agenda is. I too was skeptical at first. But after really taking the time to look into it and absorb the information, it resonated with me and I genuinely believe IVM is a terribly toxic drug with no benefits and it has NO PLACE being used or recommended for ANY REASON, EVER.

Your comment about parasites functioning more like bacteria is correct - and they do eat waste in the body. In fact, if you have parasites, it is a sign that the detox pathways in the body arent able to keep up with the amount of toxins, and the body needs help - thus, parasites come and do the job that the body cannot. And they can also produce an even more toxic waste themselves. Amandha Vollmer's article on this (which is also linked above) discusses this. DMSO can be used to remove parasites, if one so chooses to do, but you should be prepared for the after-effects and know how to best aid the body in getting rid of the toxic shit that the parasites you just killed were efficiently doing. Again, the parasites are there because the toxin level is too high for your bodies normal detox pathways to get rid of (urination, respiration, sweating, etc). So if you remove or kill the parasites, and DONT properly support the body's removal of that high toxic load, you are just creating an ideal environment for chronic disease to fester.

Please go read the articles & watch the videos about why ivermectin is toxic and should not be consumed by humans (or animals).

Then come back and let me know if you still think this article was written only out of boredom and the desire to fight & divide just for the sake of it.

Pitcher's avatar

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. It seems to me that the N0-V group mind will eventually lead to a Jonestown type scenario. Today 0-V, tomorrow, 0 exosomes, 0 molecules. We are all just water and light! The real scandal is that we have really poor experimental data on how certain specific disease syndromes transmit person to person. Until proven otherwise, I have to think that it's either toxic environment or molecular/social/spiritual nutrient deficiency. The complex organizations will fade away, our future offspring will not have packages to open and pills to take.

Bill Huston's avatar

Jonestown ??? wtf

>we have really poor experimental data on how certain specific disease syndromes transmit person to person

Haha. Then why do you presume, a priori, that these "certain disease syndroms" transmit person to person?

We also lack good experimental data on the hypothesis of how Moon Rocks cause Hurricanes. Maybe that just indicates that it's a bogus hypothesis, and that we should start over?