Convid is a psychological disease, fear. And Ivermectin treats the fear. So, if I cannot convince someone that the whole virus and pandemic are fake, I just don’t argue with them about their favored “early treatments.” It’s better for them to have the security blanket and keep their cortex (which fear would disable).
The only antidote to a psychological disease is compassion and understanding, aka shaking one's head when another says they're taking ivermectin. Our bodies already have an amazing machinery of immunity. In my opinion, trusting in our bodies is trusting in the divine.
I have a few thoughts about ivermectin I want to share.
My story in a nutshell:
2020, I was very afflicted for the huge crimes committed against everyone. And I was seeing even greater crimes looming in the horizon. Very depressed.
2021, total horror and desperation. I have never yelled so many times in my life. The first six months were the worst. Then, Kirsch and Malone and the Canadian Bridle appeared in the scene. I never liked Weinstein before, but I made an exception out of desperation to watch the pivotal show they made. Until then, I believed that there was an epidemic designed politically, I believed, without evidence, they used a worthless virus manipulated in a lab which was spread deliberately in a few places to create the appearance of a real disease. Almost everyone fell for it. Well informed people, did not. Nonetheless, well informed people were punished as much as the true covidian believers, because democracy. The purpose of all this business was to stage a controlled demolition of the debt based economy, by creating a giant strawman which will be accused of being the cause of all the damage suffered by everyone and not lose control, rather gaining even more control.
Then, after listening to that podcast, I became a believer in ivermectin. Why? because I was already a believer in vitamin C and Zinc and HCQ many other things (all compatible with the idea of restoring the terrain, although I didn't know that then) and it was not a problem for me to believe there was another thing that can cure a weak disease in most people, or a grave disease in people who are already ill and intoxicated before getting that weak virus and semi-synthetic virus I thought it was real. So, prima facie, ivermectin was one more good idea to end the carnage and save millions from the maw of the ecofascists.
Then I spent a few months watching many videos and reading many articles of people who looked good to me, who were extolling the virtues of ivermectin and decrying the evil censorship of useful information and the cancellation of doctors who were telling the truth.
Then, comes 29th October 2021. I was following the videos of Steve Kirsch. He had a "debate" with a Russo-Canadian fellow, Y. Deigin, who believes in a very deadly virus which causes a very grave disease and everyone is equally susceptible and only the holy vaccine will save us, but only if we all submit to the supreme authority of the God-state. Probably I'm caricaturing him and he is not as dumb to believe all that, he was just playing politics. Covid is all politics, really.
The video is almost 4 hours of fun. Sophistic attacks and defenses from both sides. Bear in mind, Deigin was alone against many people: among them Mathew Crawford (I love that guy) and Jack Lyons-Weiler and Jessica Rose and Marc Girardot and a few others who don't participate much.
Here Deigin and the terrain theory people converge. Deigin, like all vaccine cultists, believed ivermectin was useless to treat covid.
Naturally, I was against Deigin, due to my ideological stance, not to my understanding of covid or ivermectin or anything. This evil person wanted to poison even more innocent people, instead of promoting the idea that there was a valid treatment and therefore there was no emergency and that's the political white lie to stop the democide. Which, alas, didn't happen.
It is to me surprising that terrain people, of all people, will make what I consider a tactical mistake, of running against ivermectin. I know you want to cut all ties with the other side of the dissidence. After all the few months of attempting to build a coalition with olive branches like the famous "virus challenge" the other side has rejected all truce dialogue. I repeat: covid is all politics.
From a practical perspective, any parasite that contaminates the terrain may cause disease. As the worm eats tissue (healthy tissue or infirm tissue) it will excrete feces that remain in the body and are likely to cause further damage. Any method of removing that parasite will create, per the theory, an opportunity for the body to heal itself. Turpentine (pure gum spirits) and DMSO and many other "natural" products will help remove parasites.
This ivermectin product, and other petroleum derived medicines that mimic naturally occurring substances, seems to achieve the same purpose of cleansing the terrain. Why would those who propose terrain theory speak ill about people using ivermectin in its safe dosing range?
To me, this smells like a simple ideological temper tantrum.
Maybe natural deparasitizing products are less toxic than ivermectin. I'm not against that. Why scandalize people with exaggerations about the dangers of ivermectin?
I dislike the competition for being more right than the other guy. If it works, it works. I don't care if it is petroleum based or not.
Another story is that people are not informed about cheaper alternatives and, more importantly, safer alternatives to ivermectin, in the sense of causing fewer adverse effects. That is okay. But I prefer saying that without the sensationalism.
Covid is not a real disease, or a real syndrome, or anything. Many things are repackaged under one crazy label. This is a marketing trick, as Mike Stone has explained many times. And this trick causes damage to the unsuspecting public. But consider this scenario: a person is fraudulently told she has covid (again, for the umpteenth time, after one thousand shots of fraudulent pseudovaccines) because of a fraudulent test, and she has symptoms of parasitosis, and the reality is that her terrain is being damaged from the inside with worms, and ivermectin can help. She gets her ivermectin from one of the rebels and she gets better. "Hurray, I beat long covid thanks to science, suck that you stupid deniers", she could say doing the silliest victory lap that only a cultist can run. Well, Who am I to break the illusions of that obnoxious hypothetical lady who not only is the victim of the greatest fraud in history, she is also a victim of a fraudulent story about how ivermectin works, because it has not cured her of an imaginary disease, but of worms?
Is she wrong and dumb? Yes, in fact the last line in her record card of clotshots states clearly that she is wrong and dumb, and she is a very special democratic party voter and gets a star sticker for being such a good and obedient girl. But I don't care that much that a person gets healthier for the wrong reasons.
A totally different story is whether or not these hypothetical parasites, worms or whatever are not really causing disease, but, like bacteria, exist only to remove dead tissue caused by some intoxication, perhaps caused by the killshots. If ivermectin kills nature's little helpers to save dummy Karens from getting killed by the ecosocialists, then ivermectin is another weapon of war. But this still seems to far fetched to me.
And as much as I hate Karens and all the other types of fragilizer dogmatists that hate freedom and self-responsibility, I prefer them to be alive and healthy so that they can be taught to suck less at being human. Dead people cannot be taught to be better humans. That much is obvious.
And I hate mass murder and mass murderers. I also hate this impossible situation we are all in, by which even if you move to reduce the possibility of a person being murder, you are still creating an opening for another attack from another side. We are under a world wide siege!
I am happy that I spent most of 2022 learning about how wrong I was about germ theory. And I understand that there are people who know it is bogus, but it is politically useful, and therefore a losing, uphill battle. Romantically speaking, losing battles are the most attractive and beautiful. But I am not much into romanticism. I prefer the Baroque period. You know, the Golden Age of Pirates and all that.
:-D
Let me remind anyone that reads this super-long comment of mine, that many leaders in the no-virus side used to be normies: they believed all the lies of Rockefeller medicine, just like most people believe them today, or, at least they pretend they believe them, because they need a job, or they think they need a job like the one they have, and they whore themselves out intellectually and morally to perpetuate the fraud.
Back to Deigin. People like him love fighting more than they love solving problems, in my opinion. These people are not worth debating. They don't want truth, justice, freedom or anything. They are just boxing for boxing's sake. He is just a bored person who likes to troll the world with an important issue, like so many other useful idiots to the ecologist despots.
My question to you, Bill, is, are you guys who combat ivermectin from the terrain worldview just misbehaving out of boredom or something else, like the germ-theory side deniers of ivermectin do?
As much as I like to joke about everything, I think it is bad to antagonize people who are terrified and in a danger by telling them ivermectin will not work for their covid. These victims will never come out of their hypnosis unless they feel safe to consider other ideas about what is really happening to them. I'm mostly against ridiculing victims for the purpose of helping them, because that tactic only works in a very small number of personality types.
1: Ivermectin is in a class of compounds called ACUTELY TOXIC. The common use is as an INSECTICIDE. Bug killer. It kills Roundworms, and Lungworms, Grubs, horn flies, and sucking lice. It kills biting lice, and sarcoptic mange mites in cattle. And let's not forget Onchocerca Volvulus Worms! (well, the larval fileria anyway. Not the adult worms.) GUESS WHAT? YOUR cells and worms cells are not that different. Something toxic to bugs and worms is most likely toxic to YOU.
2: YOU DO NOT NEED IT TO "CURE YOUR COVID", because COVID **DOES NOT EXIST**!
How many times do we have to go over this?
👉NO Pathognomonic Syndrome!
👉NO Rigorous Etiology!
👉NO Isolated Suspect Pathogen
👉NO PROOF the Phantom Pathogen causes the Non-Distinguishing Syndrome!
👉NO TEST for Phantom Pathogen calibrated to Real-World Certified Reference Materials
👉NO Clinical Diagnosis for the Non-Distinguishing Syndrome
Therefore,
👉There is NO OBJECTIVE DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA for COVID!
👉There is NO DISEASE called COVID
So tell me, WHY AGAIN are you EATING an ACUTELY TOXIC INSECTICIDE?
👉Positive PCR test?
👉To cure your sniffles? (what about water, lemon-honey tea, or some orange juice?)
👉Feeling or hunch?
👉You saw on Joe Rogan that Eating Literal Insecticide was good for you, and would cure your CONVID?
Covid is a concept that belongs in the category of political slogans, not a concept of scientific medicine. The cure of covid is not medical, but political.
People have real diseases, or symptoms that hurt them or disable them in some way. It doesn't matter if their situation is purely psychogenic or not: people cannot malinger having worms that are eroding their skin, and those little bastards are not being created by the power of their mind.
Doctors are not allowed to practice medicine or say the truth. So many diseases have been repackaged under the political banner of "covid."
If doctors want to serve people with curable situations, they must play the corrupt game of politics. Plus, people who have their thinking completely captured by the spell of politics are convinced they have covid, long covid or whatever. They won't settle for something mundane like parasites. They want to feel special and up-to-date with their diseases. They need to collaborate with their cruel master which is "Politics." They have covid. Full blown.
How do you help those idiots? You walk at their pace, like doctors are known to do, and you give them what probably will help them without killing them, and then they thank you and then you feel horrible for perpetuating a lie that is destroying your country and culture and the lives of many people. But at least you served one person. Being a doctor is difficult if you are not a sociopath.
So, the reason why people use ivermectin is because the Western Doctors are morally weak and do not know how to tell the truth, and the patients are complete fools who cannot accept the truth if it goes against their deep political commitments, their worldview based on codependency with TV News Anchors.
Ivermectin will heal a person suffering from worms. Perhaps there are better natural methods, less toxic, to do that. People will not take them because the TV says "no, no, no, you will be a traitor and I won't love you anymore if you stop believing in covid."
But everything is toxic if you give enough quantity and in a high concentration. Vinegar, for instance. One component of vinegar is acetic acid. If you dehydrate acetic acid and inject it into a muscle, chances are that person will experience great pain, the muscle will die, and the person may die days later from sepsis. The body will try to cure itself from dead tissue. Lots of bacteria will appear to eat. They generate their own waste. That waste may reach the bloodstream and is likely to be toxic for many other tissues. It will cause a generalized inflammation response. The individual will be very ill. Even a healthy person in top shape may die from the progression of their poisoning with that injection of concentrated acetic acid. Can you believe people put acetic acid in their salads? People are dosing their food with well known poison? How long have they been doing that, 3000 years? Oh my God we all are gonna DIE!!!
Now, let me stop the sarcasm, literal and metaphorical, and return to my reasoning. What can be done for people who have not understood yet that covid is a lie? Tell them the truth, only that.
Some people will never hear the truth. Others will hear it if you speak to them with words their bloated egos can accept, but this is too much work. Some people will understand it with very insulting language, because they like that.
But smart people need to cut through all the crap by themselves. They won't accept that they, the super smart strategists and data analysts and the economists and the engineers, have been fooled by the pirates that run the world, unless they find the truth themselves. So they will take years to get here, and they will be the last ones to believe the politicians destroyed the world for nothing, and they got away with it.
Intellectual pride is a helluva drug.
Look at the d1lbert guy, and he is just one example. He cannot believe reality. In fact he has lived all his adult life in an alternative reality of his own device. Philosophically, he is a hard determinist: humans are only machines, moist robots, there is nothing else than that. Everything can be explained with materialistic evolutionary theory and completed neuroscience. Therefore, it is impossible that germ theory of disease is false, and that covid is false, and that he was fooled, and that he has collaborated in destroying his own country must also be false. That would mean he has to examine his own life, all of it. Too much work. Therefore, he must protect the lie of covid or he will die of shame. It is a very sad situation. But a person with too much intelligence may put herself in situations like that and much worse. They are their own parasite, if you will.
Do you remember the movie "My big fat Greek wedding"? A silly movie. In it there is a personage, I think he is the father of the female protagonist, maybe the uncle. He is always with an atomizer with window cleaning liquid (probably contains ammonia, among other things.) He is always using it on himself to prevent diseases, and he assaults people with that crap to prevent their disease. A functional hypochondriac, an expert could say.
Many people are like that. They are always being exploited by everyone. In 2019 it was decided that the war will be started by attacking those people, to get to everyone else. Doctors should have say no. Stop the entire thing from the start. We are not collaborating with this lie, we will not kill people for you to cover up the economic disaster of the decaying western empire. But doctors didn't do that. One reason why this was so is because many many many doctors are also hypochondriacs. They will believe everything that confirms their biases and they will never check anything by themselves. After all, science is based in having faith in the hierarchy of the government scientist who say... wait a minute, that is not science, that is superstitious thinking!
That's the entire problem.
We can attack ivermectin all you want. They will not examine their souls.
If people are cured of what they believe is covid, but is a totally different problem, with something as simple as a sinusal rinse, they may (may, not will) be open to being told by the person they have confidence in, that covid is not real. This won't happen because western medicine is not about telling people uncomfortable truths. People pay to be lied to. That's all.
It has social prestige to be lied to more than the next guy.
Humans are that vain.
Kinda depressing, but only for those who spend time thinking in the welfare of others.
If you attack ivermectin, you are attacking their vanity. I think that tactic is being misused. Their vanity depends to some degree on social acceptance. In some social contexts, it is acceptable to use ivermectin to show opposition to the dictatorship. It is not socially acceptable to say the truth. What a surprise.
At the very least we can say without trouble something like this: "Isn't it weird that a grave disease like covid can be easily prevented by so many treatments? Hmmmm. Makes you think, isn't it?"
It's like playing with three year olds who are connecting numbered dots with a crayon. You have to gently read the numbers for them. They need to feel they are achieving the feat of drawing the dinosaur or dolphin or dog or whatever the numbered dots describe.
But they are not children. They are adults and they know everything. Unlike children, who also know everything.
It seems to me that you didn't read any of the other links or watch any of the other videos that Bill provided above to supplement his article.
If you had, it should begin to paint a picture about just how truly toxic & sinister the Ivermectin agenda is. I too was skeptical at first. But after really taking the time to look into it and absorb the information, it resonated with me and I genuinely believe IVM is a terribly toxic drug with no benefits and it has NO PLACE being used or recommended for ANY REASON, EVER.
Your comment about parasites functioning more like bacteria is correct - and they do eat waste in the body. In fact, if you have parasites, it is a sign that the detox pathways in the body arent able to keep up with the amount of toxins, and the body needs help - thus, parasites come and do the job that the body cannot. And they can also produce an even more toxic waste themselves. Amandha Vollmer's article on this (which is also linked above) discusses this. DMSO can be used to remove parasites, if one so chooses to do, but you should be prepared for the after-effects and know how to best aid the body in getting rid of the toxic shit that the parasites you just killed were efficiently doing. Again, the parasites are there because the toxin level is too high for your bodies normal detox pathways to get rid of (urination, respiration, sweating, etc). So if you remove or kill the parasites, and DONT properly support the body's removal of that high toxic load, you are just creating an ideal environment for chronic disease to fester.
Please go read the articles & watch the videos about why ivermectin is toxic and should not be consumed by humans (or animals).
Then come back and let me know if you still think this article was written only out of boredom and the desire to fight & divide just for the sake of it.
About ADV post, I posted a comment there the same day Feb. 11th
I don't read Tim Truth posts: too sensationalistic.
The dosage of IVM is very small. That means it can be very toxic. In general, for any medicine, synthetic or natural, if the dose is small, then it is very likely to harm if the user overdoses, which may happen easily if the doctor is "distracted" or the nurse fails to notice the error of the doctor. Also when self-medicating.
That is a clue.
There is a virologist named Adam Gartner. He said he "discovered" that IVM was a cure for covid early in 2020. He did warn that too much IVM was toxic and would cause disease.
One thing that I think is important is that safety ranges are never universal. There is no average human. A "safe" dose of a drug for Marc may be toxic for Peter, because Peter is very old, or is already taking many other drugs and his body is already overwhelmed with toxicity.
I think no one studies polypharmacy. The effects (mostly adverse) of combining drugs. When they tell you, this drug at this range is safe and indicated for this symptom, they are saying nothing about whether that drug at that range of dose will wreak havoc if the user is taking drug B or drug C, or even if a combination of two or more drugs, which may be "safe" (notice the scary quotes) on their own, may react poorly to the new drug being added, which is information that cannot be learned simply by looking a drug A drug B interactions. The difficulty in all this is that you have to look for interactions between one drug and a cluster of other drugs, without forgetting to look the state of the living body where the observation happened.
The simplest answer is: stay away from all drugs, no exceptions.
About Satoshi Omura, the inventor or discoverer of ivermectin. I think I read a story (I may be mixing stories) about how deer in Japan would eat some mushrooms and people deduced it was because the mushrooms had antiparasitic effects. Then some chemist isolated what he though was the active principle of the mushroom. Then Omura made a synthetic version of that natural substance, and called it ivermectin. Who knows if all this is true. Sounds like a story from a manga.
Then there was this pathetic story about poor people in Africa who were going blind because of a parasite. And this new antiparasitic drug helped them to not go blind. If true, that is good. In the mindset of Western doctors (the Japanese are so western that they are to the West of America) it is better to run the risk of toxicity to other parts of the body if what is to be gained is superior, like preserving the vision. We can deal with toxicity later, if we are lucky.
It is worth noting that the "Eugenics" idea is implicit in many people, mostly progressives. It is so fundamental that they don't even understand they have it: inferior quality people, damaged people, defective people must not be allowed to reproduce. This is pure illiberal progressivism present in left, right and center.
That idea is "normal" for them.
They know that people don't like to be called inferior and don't like to be sterilized. And they like to pretend that sterilization only affects the reproductive organs, and not other parts of the whole body. The progressives lie to themselves in order to lie to everyone.
Most people don't really want to go through the ordeal of having more kids later in life, and it seems there are natural reasons for that, so they understand the bargain of damage to the reproductive system in exchange for preserving life or vision or walking or other things is likely the best option, given the very little information they have about anything else. Consumers of Medicine are often cornered, almost coerced to say yes.
About boredom. I don't know if the terrain theorists write against IVM out of boredom, that's why I'm asking. I compare them to germ-theory affirmationists who are anti-IVM warriors because it looked to me that those people were just bored an they didn't want to understand the finer points of the problem.
You see, covid is, for some very unlearned people and some very ill intended people, an extremely deadly disease, no one is safe, and there is no treatment, there can be no treatment of any kind, only the Holy Vaccine From Heaven can save us, but only if all the heretics are converted to the one true faith of the Omnipotent God-State that created everything about 500 years ago. These people are wrong.
Then we have people who say covid is mild for most, and only a very small number of people are at risk, and they can be protected with early treatment, so the false vaccine was not necessary. That tactic didn't work, but they will be forever stuck in it.
Then there are people who see there is no covid. There was collective hysteria, caused for political reasons. Man people died because of that. And now there is individual hysteria. Which is a normal situation in modern medicine. It has always been the case that some people are spooked beyond their wits, and they begin to suffer all sorts of problems. Doctors don't know how to help. Some doctors invent diseases and treatments just to help these hypochondriacs. The hypochondriacs normally don't accept the help, and go back to their obsessions. The deep problem was not cured with the little white lie.
The no-covid people tackle the problem from other perspectives. Doctors don't like other perspective. They like their perspective. Doctors are extremely territorial. There can only be one way, which is their way. They alone can be the savior. They like laws that give them power and recognizes that they are of a divine nature... Doctors have their own set of psychological problems to deal with.
The problem is that we are in the middle of a political war for domination. Some people collaborate with power some oppose to power. In the process of expansion of power people are defraud, robbed from and killed. In this occasion, the killing is done medically. Power pretends people are ill, collaborators collaborate. People are helpless and ignorant. They seek protection. They are not ready to learn to protect themselves. IVM seems like a godsend. It doesn't matter whether it works or not. And it may be the case that it is a poisoned candy from Power, a switcheroo. I think its better to not add scandal to these people. To explain things with more calm. Give them less toxic alternatives, like Jennifer Daniels did.
Simplify.
Don't exploit the fear of people.
Tell them they don't have to be afraid.
That is more reasonable, I think, that telling them afraid of IVM. You only need to inform about the dangers of IVM, and there is no need to abuse fragile people in order to inform them.
Fear tactics don't work well for the purpose of helping people overcome their addiction to fear.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. It seems to me that the N0-V group mind will eventually lead to a Jonestown type scenario. Today 0-V, tomorrow, 0 exosomes, 0 molecules. We are all just water and light! The real scandal is that we have really poor experimental data on how certain specific disease syndromes transmit person to person. Until proven otherwise, I have to think that it's either toxic environment or molecular/social/spiritual nutrient deficiency. The complex organizations will fade away, our future offspring will not have packages to open and pills to take.
>we have really poor experimental data on how certain specific disease syndromes transmit person to person
Haha. Then why do you presume, a priori, that these "certain disease syndroms" transmit person to person?
We also lack good experimental data on the hypothesis of how Moon Rocks cause Hurricanes. Maybe that just indicates that it's a bogus hypothesis, and that we should start over?
GREAT collection of articles, Bill, quite an encyclopedia version of a cautionary note. Damn all these "resistance" people who are pushing or clinging on to this nefarious chemical.
But again, all you need is LOGIC. If you understand COVID is not a real disease, then you also know that you don't need ANY therapy to treat or prevent it, especially an ACUTELY TOXIC "cure"!!
You ever see that interview of him when Microsoft got sued for violating anti-trust laws.... he looks so disturbed - autistic-like. He is rocking back & forth for SEVERAL minutes in between questioning, very slow to respond. Almost like he was just... slow. Y'know, retarded, mentally handicapped.
It is VASTLY different from the Bill Gates we see today when interviewed. I always wondered how/what was able to give him such a massive transformation. Its very odd. Maybe this is common knowledge and ive just not looked into it enough. But I think about this sometimes - I think about that young guy being interviewed, rocking back & forth - and wonder how someone like that becomes the evil villain we know & hate today....
Hearing from people that have worked at MS HQ, he has always been aggressive and demeaning and berating staff. My GUESS is that his rocking interview was trained acting to seem distressed and immature and to throw the interviewer off-guard. His image has been molded in many PR stunts and public performances. All of the black Generals of the Comm of 300 (Fauci, Soros, even Trump, Obama, Bushes and Musk) are indoctrinated, trained, and PR'd from head to toe--as a side effect, and also as a criteria to get those positions, they had to be a bit disturbed from very young.
When I had a Diverticulitis attack I was given a ant-parasitic Flagal. Very much in the same group as Stromecol or Ivermeticin. No argument, while the vision side effects were bad, it worked.
My vision went real blurry and took weeks to go back to my normal. I'm the main driver as my Hub has Retinal Atrophy and severe Glaucoma.
What they don't tell those who get Catracts removed is they develop Dry Eyes, same goes for Lasix's. I had to have the messed up Catract implant in one eye corrected, and Lasik is the fix. Add in lots of computer time you forget to blink, and your eyes get super dry. I now need new lenses yearly. Age doesn't help it.
Convid is a psychological disease, fear. And Ivermectin treats the fear. So, if I cannot convince someone that the whole virus and pandemic are fake, I just don’t argue with them about their favored “early treatments.” It’s better for them to have the security blanket and keep their cortex (which fear would disable).
The only antidote to a psychological disease is compassion and understanding, aka shaking one's head when another says they're taking ivermectin. Our bodies already have an amazing machinery of immunity. In my opinion, trusting in our bodies is trusting in the divine.
Hello Bill Huston.
I have a few thoughts about ivermectin I want to share.
My story in a nutshell:
2020, I was very afflicted for the huge crimes committed against everyone. And I was seeing even greater crimes looming in the horizon. Very depressed.
2021, total horror and desperation. I have never yelled so many times in my life. The first six months were the worst. Then, Kirsch and Malone and the Canadian Bridle appeared in the scene. I never liked Weinstein before, but I made an exception out of desperation to watch the pivotal show they made. Until then, I believed that there was an epidemic designed politically, I believed, without evidence, they used a worthless virus manipulated in a lab which was spread deliberately in a few places to create the appearance of a real disease. Almost everyone fell for it. Well informed people, did not. Nonetheless, well informed people were punished as much as the true covidian believers, because democracy. The purpose of all this business was to stage a controlled demolition of the debt based economy, by creating a giant strawman which will be accused of being the cause of all the damage suffered by everyone and not lose control, rather gaining even more control.
Then, after listening to that podcast, I became a believer in ivermectin. Why? because I was already a believer in vitamin C and Zinc and HCQ many other things (all compatible with the idea of restoring the terrain, although I didn't know that then) and it was not a problem for me to believe there was another thing that can cure a weak disease in most people, or a grave disease in people who are already ill and intoxicated before getting that weak virus and semi-synthetic virus I thought it was real. So, prima facie, ivermectin was one more good idea to end the carnage and save millions from the maw of the ecofascists.
Then I spent a few months watching many videos and reading many articles of people who looked good to me, who were extolling the virtues of ivermectin and decrying the evil censorship of useful information and the cancellation of doctors who were telling the truth.
Then, comes 29th October 2021. I was following the videos of Steve Kirsch. He had a "debate" with a Russo-Canadian fellow, Y. Deigin, who believes in a very deadly virus which causes a very grave disease and everyone is equally susceptible and only the holy vaccine will save us, but only if we all submit to the supreme authority of the God-state. Probably I'm caricaturing him and he is not as dumb to believe all that, he was just playing politics. Covid is all politics, really.
The video is almost 4 hours of fun. Sophistic attacks and defenses from both sides. Bear in mind, Deigin was alone against many people: among them Mathew Crawford (I love that guy) and Jack Lyons-Weiler and Jessica Rose and Marc Girardot and a few others who don't participate much.
Here Deigin and the terrain theory people converge. Deigin, like all vaccine cultists, believed ivermectin was useless to treat covid.
Naturally, I was against Deigin, due to my ideological stance, not to my understanding of covid or ivermectin or anything. This evil person wanted to poison even more innocent people, instead of promoting the idea that there was a valid treatment and therefore there was no emergency and that's the political white lie to stop the democide. Which, alas, didn't happen.
It is to me surprising that terrain people, of all people, will make what I consider a tactical mistake, of running against ivermectin. I know you want to cut all ties with the other side of the dissidence. After all the few months of attempting to build a coalition with olive branches like the famous "virus challenge" the other side has rejected all truce dialogue. I repeat: covid is all politics.
From a practical perspective, any parasite that contaminates the terrain may cause disease. As the worm eats tissue (healthy tissue or infirm tissue) it will excrete feces that remain in the body and are likely to cause further damage. Any method of removing that parasite will create, per the theory, an opportunity for the body to heal itself. Turpentine (pure gum spirits) and DMSO and many other "natural" products will help remove parasites.
This ivermectin product, and other petroleum derived medicines that mimic naturally occurring substances, seems to achieve the same purpose of cleansing the terrain. Why would those who propose terrain theory speak ill about people using ivermectin in its safe dosing range?
To me, this smells like a simple ideological temper tantrum.
Maybe natural deparasitizing products are less toxic than ivermectin. I'm not against that. Why scandalize people with exaggerations about the dangers of ivermectin?
I dislike the competition for being more right than the other guy. If it works, it works. I don't care if it is petroleum based or not.
Another story is that people are not informed about cheaper alternatives and, more importantly, safer alternatives to ivermectin, in the sense of causing fewer adverse effects. That is okay. But I prefer saying that without the sensationalism.
Covid is not a real disease, or a real syndrome, or anything. Many things are repackaged under one crazy label. This is a marketing trick, as Mike Stone has explained many times. And this trick causes damage to the unsuspecting public. But consider this scenario: a person is fraudulently told she has covid (again, for the umpteenth time, after one thousand shots of fraudulent pseudovaccines) because of a fraudulent test, and she has symptoms of parasitosis, and the reality is that her terrain is being damaged from the inside with worms, and ivermectin can help. She gets her ivermectin from one of the rebels and she gets better. "Hurray, I beat long covid thanks to science, suck that you stupid deniers", she could say doing the silliest victory lap that only a cultist can run. Well, Who am I to break the illusions of that obnoxious hypothetical lady who not only is the victim of the greatest fraud in history, she is also a victim of a fraudulent story about how ivermectin works, because it has not cured her of an imaginary disease, but of worms?
Is she wrong and dumb? Yes, in fact the last line in her record card of clotshots states clearly that she is wrong and dumb, and she is a very special democratic party voter and gets a star sticker for being such a good and obedient girl. But I don't care that much that a person gets healthier for the wrong reasons.
A totally different story is whether or not these hypothetical parasites, worms or whatever are not really causing disease, but, like bacteria, exist only to remove dead tissue caused by some intoxication, perhaps caused by the killshots. If ivermectin kills nature's little helpers to save dummy Karens from getting killed by the ecosocialists, then ivermectin is another weapon of war. But this still seems to far fetched to me.
And as much as I hate Karens and all the other types of fragilizer dogmatists that hate freedom and self-responsibility, I prefer them to be alive and healthy so that they can be taught to suck less at being human. Dead people cannot be taught to be better humans. That much is obvious.
And I hate mass murder and mass murderers. I also hate this impossible situation we are all in, by which even if you move to reduce the possibility of a person being murder, you are still creating an opening for another attack from another side. We are under a world wide siege!
I am happy that I spent most of 2022 learning about how wrong I was about germ theory. And I understand that there are people who know it is bogus, but it is politically useful, and therefore a losing, uphill battle. Romantically speaking, losing battles are the most attractive and beautiful. But I am not much into romanticism. I prefer the Baroque period. You know, the Golden Age of Pirates and all that.
:-D
Let me remind anyone that reads this super-long comment of mine, that many leaders in the no-virus side used to be normies: they believed all the lies of Rockefeller medicine, just like most people believe them today, or, at least they pretend they believe them, because they need a job, or they think they need a job like the one they have, and they whore themselves out intellectually and morally to perpetuate the fraud.
Back to Deigin. People like him love fighting more than they love solving problems, in my opinion. These people are not worth debating. They don't want truth, justice, freedom or anything. They are just boxing for boxing's sake. He is just a bored person who likes to troll the world with an important issue, like so many other useful idiots to the ecologist despots.
My question to you, Bill, is, are you guys who combat ivermectin from the terrain worldview just misbehaving out of boredom or something else, like the germ-theory side deniers of ivermectin do?
As much as I like to joke about everything, I think it is bad to antagonize people who are terrified and in a danger by telling them ivermectin will not work for their covid. These victims will never come out of their hypnosis unless they feel safe to consider other ideas about what is really happening to them. I'm mostly against ridiculing victims for the purpose of helping them, because that tactic only works in a very small number of personality types.
Those are my thoughts.
It's really simple.
1: Ivermectin is in a class of compounds called ACUTELY TOXIC. The common use is as an INSECTICIDE. Bug killer. It kills Roundworms, and Lungworms, Grubs, horn flies, and sucking lice. It kills biting lice, and sarcoptic mange mites in cattle. And let's not forget Onchocerca Volvulus Worms! (well, the larval fileria anyway. Not the adult worms.) GUESS WHAT? YOUR cells and worms cells are not that different. Something toxic to bugs and worms is most likely toxic to YOU.
2: YOU DO NOT NEED IT TO "CURE YOUR COVID", because COVID **DOES NOT EXIST**!
How many times do we have to go over this?
👉NO Pathognomonic Syndrome!
👉NO Rigorous Etiology!
👉NO Isolated Suspect Pathogen
👉NO PROOF the Phantom Pathogen causes the Non-Distinguishing Syndrome!
👉NO TEST for Phantom Pathogen calibrated to Real-World Certified Reference Materials
👉NO Clinical Diagnosis for the Non-Distinguishing Syndrome
Therefore,
👉There is NO OBJECTIVE DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA for COVID!
👉There is NO DISEASE called COVID
So tell me, WHY AGAIN are you EATING an ACUTELY TOXIC INSECTICIDE?
👉Positive PCR test?
👉To cure your sniffles? (what about water, lemon-honey tea, or some orange juice?)
👉Feeling or hunch?
👉You saw on Joe Rogan that Eating Literal Insecticide was good for you, and would cure your CONVID?
Covid is a concept that belongs in the category of political slogans, not a concept of scientific medicine. The cure of covid is not medical, but political.
People have real diseases, or symptoms that hurt them or disable them in some way. It doesn't matter if their situation is purely psychogenic or not: people cannot malinger having worms that are eroding their skin, and those little bastards are not being created by the power of their mind.
Doctors are not allowed to practice medicine or say the truth. So many diseases have been repackaged under the political banner of "covid."
If doctors want to serve people with curable situations, they must play the corrupt game of politics. Plus, people who have their thinking completely captured by the spell of politics are convinced they have covid, long covid or whatever. They won't settle for something mundane like parasites. They want to feel special and up-to-date with their diseases. They need to collaborate with their cruel master which is "Politics." They have covid. Full blown.
How do you help those idiots? You walk at their pace, like doctors are known to do, and you give them what probably will help them without killing them, and then they thank you and then you feel horrible for perpetuating a lie that is destroying your country and culture and the lives of many people. But at least you served one person. Being a doctor is difficult if you are not a sociopath.
So, the reason why people use ivermectin is because the Western Doctors are morally weak and do not know how to tell the truth, and the patients are complete fools who cannot accept the truth if it goes against their deep political commitments, their worldview based on codependency with TV News Anchors.
Ivermectin will heal a person suffering from worms. Perhaps there are better natural methods, less toxic, to do that. People will not take them because the TV says "no, no, no, you will be a traitor and I won't love you anymore if you stop believing in covid."
But everything is toxic if you give enough quantity and in a high concentration. Vinegar, for instance. One component of vinegar is acetic acid. If you dehydrate acetic acid and inject it into a muscle, chances are that person will experience great pain, the muscle will die, and the person may die days later from sepsis. The body will try to cure itself from dead tissue. Lots of bacteria will appear to eat. They generate their own waste. That waste may reach the bloodstream and is likely to be toxic for many other tissues. It will cause a generalized inflammation response. The individual will be very ill. Even a healthy person in top shape may die from the progression of their poisoning with that injection of concentrated acetic acid. Can you believe people put acetic acid in their salads? People are dosing their food with well known poison? How long have they been doing that, 3000 years? Oh my God we all are gonna DIE!!!
Now, let me stop the sarcasm, literal and metaphorical, and return to my reasoning. What can be done for people who have not understood yet that covid is a lie? Tell them the truth, only that.
Some people will never hear the truth. Others will hear it if you speak to them with words their bloated egos can accept, but this is too much work. Some people will understand it with very insulting language, because they like that.
But smart people need to cut through all the crap by themselves. They won't accept that they, the super smart strategists and data analysts and the economists and the engineers, have been fooled by the pirates that run the world, unless they find the truth themselves. So they will take years to get here, and they will be the last ones to believe the politicians destroyed the world for nothing, and they got away with it.
Intellectual pride is a helluva drug.
Look at the d1lbert guy, and he is just one example. He cannot believe reality. In fact he has lived all his adult life in an alternative reality of his own device. Philosophically, he is a hard determinist: humans are only machines, moist robots, there is nothing else than that. Everything can be explained with materialistic evolutionary theory and completed neuroscience. Therefore, it is impossible that germ theory of disease is false, and that covid is false, and that he was fooled, and that he has collaborated in destroying his own country must also be false. That would mean he has to examine his own life, all of it. Too much work. Therefore, he must protect the lie of covid or he will die of shame. It is a very sad situation. But a person with too much intelligence may put herself in situations like that and much worse. They are their own parasite, if you will.
Do you remember the movie "My big fat Greek wedding"? A silly movie. In it there is a personage, I think he is the father of the female protagonist, maybe the uncle. He is always with an atomizer with window cleaning liquid (probably contains ammonia, among other things.) He is always using it on himself to prevent diseases, and he assaults people with that crap to prevent their disease. A functional hypochondriac, an expert could say.
Many people are like that. They are always being exploited by everyone. In 2019 it was decided that the war will be started by attacking those people, to get to everyone else. Doctors should have say no. Stop the entire thing from the start. We are not collaborating with this lie, we will not kill people for you to cover up the economic disaster of the decaying western empire. But doctors didn't do that. One reason why this was so is because many many many doctors are also hypochondriacs. They will believe everything that confirms their biases and they will never check anything by themselves. After all, science is based in having faith in the hierarchy of the government scientist who say... wait a minute, that is not science, that is superstitious thinking!
That's the entire problem.
We can attack ivermectin all you want. They will not examine their souls.
If people are cured of what they believe is covid, but is a totally different problem, with something as simple as a sinusal rinse, they may (may, not will) be open to being told by the person they have confidence in, that covid is not real. This won't happen because western medicine is not about telling people uncomfortable truths. People pay to be lied to. That's all.
It has social prestige to be lied to more than the next guy.
Humans are that vain.
Kinda depressing, but only for those who spend time thinking in the welfare of others.
If you attack ivermectin, you are attacking their vanity. I think that tactic is being misused. Their vanity depends to some degree on social acceptance. In some social contexts, it is acceptable to use ivermectin to show opposition to the dictatorship. It is not socially acceptable to say the truth. What a surprise.
At the very least we can say without trouble something like this: "Isn't it weird that a grave disease like covid can be easily prevented by so many treatments? Hmmmm. Makes you think, isn't it?"
It's like playing with three year olds who are connecting numbered dots with a crayon. You have to gently read the numbers for them. They need to feel they are achieving the feat of drawing the dinosaur or dolphin or dog or whatever the numbered dots describe.
But they are not children. They are adults and they know everything. Unlike children, who also know everything.
It's tiresome.
Like reading my comments.
Thank you
It seems to me that you didn't read any of the other links or watch any of the other videos that Bill provided above to supplement his article.
If you had, it should begin to paint a picture about just how truly toxic & sinister the Ivermectin agenda is. I too was skeptical at first. But after really taking the time to look into it and absorb the information, it resonated with me and I genuinely believe IVM is a terribly toxic drug with no benefits and it has NO PLACE being used or recommended for ANY REASON, EVER.
Your comment about parasites functioning more like bacteria is correct - and they do eat waste in the body. In fact, if you have parasites, it is a sign that the detox pathways in the body arent able to keep up with the amount of toxins, and the body needs help - thus, parasites come and do the job that the body cannot. And they can also produce an even more toxic waste themselves. Amandha Vollmer's article on this (which is also linked above) discusses this. DMSO can be used to remove parasites, if one so chooses to do, but you should be prepared for the after-effects and know how to best aid the body in getting rid of the toxic shit that the parasites you just killed were efficiently doing. Again, the parasites are there because the toxin level is too high for your bodies normal detox pathways to get rid of (urination, respiration, sweating, etc). So if you remove or kill the parasites, and DONT properly support the body's removal of that high toxic load, you are just creating an ideal environment for chronic disease to fester.
Please go read the articles & watch the videos about why ivermectin is toxic and should not be consumed by humans (or animals).
Then come back and let me know if you still think this article was written only out of boredom and the desire to fight & divide just for the sake of it.
Thanks for your comment QuEv.
About ADV post, I posted a comment there the same day Feb. 11th
I don't read Tim Truth posts: too sensationalistic.
The dosage of IVM is very small. That means it can be very toxic. In general, for any medicine, synthetic or natural, if the dose is small, then it is very likely to harm if the user overdoses, which may happen easily if the doctor is "distracted" or the nurse fails to notice the error of the doctor. Also when self-medicating.
That is a clue.
There is a virologist named Adam Gartner. He said he "discovered" that IVM was a cure for covid early in 2020. He did warn that too much IVM was toxic and would cause disease.
One thing that I think is important is that safety ranges are never universal. There is no average human. A "safe" dose of a drug for Marc may be toxic for Peter, because Peter is very old, or is already taking many other drugs and his body is already overwhelmed with toxicity.
I think no one studies polypharmacy. The effects (mostly adverse) of combining drugs. When they tell you, this drug at this range is safe and indicated for this symptom, they are saying nothing about whether that drug at that range of dose will wreak havoc if the user is taking drug B or drug C, or even if a combination of two or more drugs, which may be "safe" (notice the scary quotes) on their own, may react poorly to the new drug being added, which is information that cannot be learned simply by looking a drug A drug B interactions. The difficulty in all this is that you have to look for interactions between one drug and a cluster of other drugs, without forgetting to look the state of the living body where the observation happened.
The simplest answer is: stay away from all drugs, no exceptions.
About Satoshi Omura, the inventor or discoverer of ivermectin. I think I read a story (I may be mixing stories) about how deer in Japan would eat some mushrooms and people deduced it was because the mushrooms had antiparasitic effects. Then some chemist isolated what he though was the active principle of the mushroom. Then Omura made a synthetic version of that natural substance, and called it ivermectin. Who knows if all this is true. Sounds like a story from a manga.
Then there was this pathetic story about poor people in Africa who were going blind because of a parasite. And this new antiparasitic drug helped them to not go blind. If true, that is good. In the mindset of Western doctors (the Japanese are so western that they are to the West of America) it is better to run the risk of toxicity to other parts of the body if what is to be gained is superior, like preserving the vision. We can deal with toxicity later, if we are lucky.
It is worth noting that the "Eugenics" idea is implicit in many people, mostly progressives. It is so fundamental that they don't even understand they have it: inferior quality people, damaged people, defective people must not be allowed to reproduce. This is pure illiberal progressivism present in left, right and center.
That idea is "normal" for them.
They know that people don't like to be called inferior and don't like to be sterilized. And they like to pretend that sterilization only affects the reproductive organs, and not other parts of the whole body. The progressives lie to themselves in order to lie to everyone.
Most people don't really want to go through the ordeal of having more kids later in life, and it seems there are natural reasons for that, so they understand the bargain of damage to the reproductive system in exchange for preserving life or vision or walking or other things is likely the best option, given the very little information they have about anything else. Consumers of Medicine are often cornered, almost coerced to say yes.
About boredom. I don't know if the terrain theorists write against IVM out of boredom, that's why I'm asking. I compare them to germ-theory affirmationists who are anti-IVM warriors because it looked to me that those people were just bored an they didn't want to understand the finer points of the problem.
You see, covid is, for some very unlearned people and some very ill intended people, an extremely deadly disease, no one is safe, and there is no treatment, there can be no treatment of any kind, only the Holy Vaccine From Heaven can save us, but only if all the heretics are converted to the one true faith of the Omnipotent God-State that created everything about 500 years ago. These people are wrong.
Then we have people who say covid is mild for most, and only a very small number of people are at risk, and they can be protected with early treatment, so the false vaccine was not necessary. That tactic didn't work, but they will be forever stuck in it.
Then there are people who see there is no covid. There was collective hysteria, caused for political reasons. Man people died because of that. And now there is individual hysteria. Which is a normal situation in modern medicine. It has always been the case that some people are spooked beyond their wits, and they begin to suffer all sorts of problems. Doctors don't know how to help. Some doctors invent diseases and treatments just to help these hypochondriacs. The hypochondriacs normally don't accept the help, and go back to their obsessions. The deep problem was not cured with the little white lie.
The no-covid people tackle the problem from other perspectives. Doctors don't like other perspective. They like their perspective. Doctors are extremely territorial. There can only be one way, which is their way. They alone can be the savior. They like laws that give them power and recognizes that they are of a divine nature... Doctors have their own set of psychological problems to deal with.
The problem is that we are in the middle of a political war for domination. Some people collaborate with power some oppose to power. In the process of expansion of power people are defraud, robbed from and killed. In this occasion, the killing is done medically. Power pretends people are ill, collaborators collaborate. People are helpless and ignorant. They seek protection. They are not ready to learn to protect themselves. IVM seems like a godsend. It doesn't matter whether it works or not. And it may be the case that it is a poisoned candy from Power, a switcheroo. I think its better to not add scandal to these people. To explain things with more calm. Give them less toxic alternatives, like Jennifer Daniels did.
Simplify.
Don't exploit the fear of people.
Tell them they don't have to be afraid.
That is more reasonable, I think, that telling them afraid of IVM. You only need to inform about the dangers of IVM, and there is no need to abuse fragile people in order to inform them.
Fear tactics don't work well for the purpose of helping people overcome their addiction to fear.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. It seems to me that the N0-V group mind will eventually lead to a Jonestown type scenario. Today 0-V, tomorrow, 0 exosomes, 0 molecules. We are all just water and light! The real scandal is that we have really poor experimental data on how certain specific disease syndromes transmit person to person. Until proven otherwise, I have to think that it's either toxic environment or molecular/social/spiritual nutrient deficiency. The complex organizations will fade away, our future offspring will not have packages to open and pills to take.
Jonestown ??? wtf
>we have really poor experimental data on how certain specific disease syndromes transmit person to person
Haha. Then why do you presume, a priori, that these "certain disease syndroms" transmit person to person?
We also lack good experimental data on the hypothesis of how Moon Rocks cause Hurricanes. Maybe that just indicates that it's a bogus hypothesis, and that we should start over?
GREAT collection of articles, Bill, quite an encyclopedia version of a cautionary note. Damn all these "resistance" people who are pushing or clinging on to this nefarious chemical.
Thanks Bill
Jo
What about all the people that cute their own cancer with ivermectin and fenben??
i would be careful ....
Gates Foundation has given MILLIONS to Ivermectin research:
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Agatesfoundation.org+ivermectin
But again, all you need is LOGIC. If you understand COVID is not a real disease, then you also know that you don't need ANY therapy to treat or prevent it, especially an ACUTELY TOXIC "cure"!!
He's just a puppet and monster, IBM helped him make Microsoft, he's just a slurping silver spoons Globalist, he doesnt know how to code anything.
You ever see that interview of him when Microsoft got sued for violating anti-trust laws.... he looks so disturbed - autistic-like. He is rocking back & forth for SEVERAL minutes in between questioning, very slow to respond. Almost like he was just... slow. Y'know, retarded, mentally handicapped.
It is VASTLY different from the Bill Gates we see today when interviewed. I always wondered how/what was able to give him such a massive transformation. Its very odd. Maybe this is common knowledge and ive just not looked into it enough. But I think about this sometimes - I think about that young guy being interviewed, rocking back & forth - and wonder how someone like that becomes the evil villain we know & hate today....
Hearing from people that have worked at MS HQ, he has always been aggressive and demeaning and berating staff. My GUESS is that his rocking interview was trained acting to seem distressed and immature and to throw the interviewer off-guard. His image has been molded in many PR stunts and public performances. All of the black Generals of the Comm of 300 (Fauci, Soros, even Trump, Obama, Bushes and Musk) are indoctrinated, trained, and PR'd from head to toe--as a side effect, and also as a criteria to get those positions, they had to be a bit disturbed from very young.
Adrenochrome. He sold his soul.
And a college dropout eugenicist...
Exclusive: From the Peak of Fitness to Wanting to Die — How the COVID Vaccine Ruined One Man’s Life
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/adam-rowland-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-injury/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=8474c056-42d3-4944-b25a-3a4eea3ab01f
OFF TOPIC
Ignore everything that this Bill Huston writes. He is a manipulative crook who is probably being paid to smear people and create fake narratives.
You're a disgusting human being. The only people you are fooling are ignorant sheep.
You should stop going after good people and mind your own business, I think that would be a smart thing for you to do.
When I had a Diverticulitis attack I was given a ant-parasitic Flagal. Very much in the same group as Stromecol or Ivermeticin. No argument, while the vision side effects were bad, it worked.
Can I ask what the vision-related side-effects were for you?
My vision went real blurry and took weeks to go back to my normal. I'm the main driver as my Hub has Retinal Atrophy and severe Glaucoma.
What they don't tell those who get Catracts removed is they develop Dry Eyes, same goes for Lasix's. I had to have the messed up Catract implant in one eye corrected, and Lasik is the fix. Add in lots of computer time you forget to blink, and your eyes get super dry. I now need new lenses yearly. Age doesn't help it.